{
  "aliases": null,
  "backlinks": [
    {
      "field": "proves",
      "target": "Z6AME2YK9K"
    }
  ],
  "body": "\n## Statement\n\nCantor (1897) extended the intuitive notion of \"the infinite\" – one foot placed after the other in a never-ending march toward the horizon – to the notion of \"a completed infinite\" – the arrival \"all the way, way out there\" in one fell swoop, and he symbolized this notion with a single sign ℵ\u003csub\u003e0\u003c/sub\u003e (aleph-null). Hilbert's adoption of the notion wholesale was \"thoughtless\", Brouwer alleged. Brouwer in his (1927a) \"Intuitionistic reflections on formalism\" states: \"SECOND INSIGHT The rejection of the thoughtless use of the logical principle of the excluded middle, as well as the recognition, first, of the fact that the investigation of the question why the principle mentioned is justified and to what extent it is valid constitutes an essential object of research in the foundations of mathematics, and, second, of the fact that in intuitive (contentual) mathematics this principle is valid only for finite systems. THIRD INSIGHT. The identification of the principle of excluded middle with the principle of the solvability of every mathematical problem.\"\n\nThis Third Insight is referring to Hilbert's second problem and Hilbert's ongoing attempt to axiomatize all of arithmetic, and with this system, to discover a \"consistency proof\" for all of mathematics. So into this fray (started by Poincaré) Brouwer plunged head-long, with Weyl as back-up.\n\nTheir first complaint (Brouwer's Second Insight, above) arose from Hilbert's extension of Aristotle's \"Law of Excluded Middle\" (and \"double negation\") – hitherto restricted to finite domains of Aristotelian discourse – to *infinite* domains of discourse. In the late 1890s Hilbert axiomatized geometry. Then he went on to use the Cantorian-inspired notion of the completed infinity to produce elegant, radically abbreviated proofs in analysis (1896 and afterwards). In his own words of defense, Hilbert believed himself justified in what he had done (in the following he calls this type of proof an existence proof): \"...I stated a general theorem (1896) on algebraic forms that is a pure existence statement and by its very nature cannot be transformed into a statement involving constructibility. Purely by use of this existence theorem I avoided the lengthy and unclear argumentation of Weierstrass and the highly complicated calculations of Dedekind, and in addition, I believe, only my proof uncovers the inner reason for the validity of the assertions adumbrated by Gauss and formulated by Weierstrass and Dedekind.\" \"The value of pure existence proofs consists precisely in that the individual construction is eliminated by them and that many different constructions are subsumed under one fundamental idea, so that only what is essential to the proof stands out clearly; brevity and economy of thought are the *raison d'être* of existence proofs.\"\n\nWhat Hilbert had to give up was \"constructibility.\" His proofs would not produce \"objects\" (except for the proofs themselves – i.e., symbol strings), but rather they would produce contradictions of the premises and have to proceed by [[reductio ad absurdum|0J0XBKG64S]] extended over the infinite.\n",
  "commit": "135c6437fad4260afa9c407aa7649bf9dea295b7",
  "front": {
    "inventory": [
      "4DCNNGEJ1K"
    ],
    "kind": "statement",
    "name": "The law of excluded middle extended to the infinite",
    "role": "proposition",
    "sources": [
      {
        "locator": "Brouwer–Hilbert controversy, section Deeper philosophic differences \u003e The law of excluded middle extended to the infinite",
        "mention": "wikipedia://en/19245793#CQIJ",
        "note": "adopted",
        "sections": [
          "Statement"
        ],
        "wikipedia": "en:19245793@r1363412426"
      }
    ],
    "tag": "QPVY2RP976"
  },
  "kind": "statement",
  "link": "https://math2.tamnd.com/node/QPVY2RP976/",
  "links": null,
  "markdown": "https://math2.tamnd.com/node/QPVY2RP976.md",
  "msc": null,
  "name": "The law of excluded middle extended to the infinite",
  "prov": null,
  "role": "proposition",
  "source": "https://github.com/tamnd/math2/blob/main/nodes/QPV/QPVY2RP976.md",
  "status": null,
  "tag": "QPVY2RP976",
  "uri": "m2://QPVY2RP976",
  "url": "https://math2.tamnd.com/wiki/the-law-of-excluded-middle-extended-to-the-infinite/",
  "writing": {
    "tag": "QPVY2RP976",
    "kind": "statement",
    "level": "W0",
    "next": [
      {
        "what": "edge uses out",
        "note": "each definition that the statement needs",
        "have": 0,
        "want": 1
      }
    ]
  }
}