Math 2.0

statement theorem

Chernoff bound

Statement

Let XX be a real random variable with moment-generating function MX(t)=E[etX]M_X(t) = E[e^{tX}], and let a∈Ra \in \mathbb{R}. Then P(X≥a)≤inf⁡t>0e−taMX(t).P(X \ge a) \le \inf_{t > 0} e^{-ta} M_X(t).

Remarks

Proof: for each t>0t > 0, {X≥a}={etX≥eta}\{X \ge a\} = \{e^{tX} \ge e^{ta}\}. Markov's inequality gives P(X≥a)≤e−taE[etX]P(X \ge a) \le e^{-ta} E[e^{tX}]. Then take the infimum over tt. For a sum SS of independent XiX_i, MS=∏iMXiM_S = \prod_i M_{X_i}. So the bound becomes inf⁡t>0e−ta∏iMXi(t)\inf_{t > 0} e^{-ta} \prod_i M_{X_i}(t), which decreases exponentially in many cases. For S∼Bin⁡(n,p)S \sim \operatorname{Bin}(n, p) with mean μ=np\mu = np and 0<δ0 < \delta, a standard consequence is P(S≥(1+δ)μ)≤(eδ/(1+δ)1+δ)μP(S \ge (1 + \delta)\mu) \le \left(e^{\delta} / (1 + \delta)^{1 + \delta}\right)^{\mu}.

History

The bound is named after Herman Chernoff.

Explanations

L1 human

The Chernoff bound gives tail estimates that decrease very fast, often exponentially. It is much stronger than Chebyshev's inequality for sums of many independent terms, such as the number of heads in many tosses.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What depends on this

1 node uses this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernoff_bound, Generic Chernoff bounds