statement theorem
Convergence in probability implies convergence in distribution
Statement
Let be real random variables on one probability space. If in probability, then in distribution.
Remarks
Proof: for , and . Let and then . At a continuity point of , this gives . The converse is false. Let and for all . Then in distribution, but does not tend to . The converse holds when the limit is a constant: if in distribution for a real , then in probability.
Explanations
L1 human
If is very likely to be close to , then the probabilities for are close to those for . But two variables can have the same law and still be far apart, so the converse fails.
What this node needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.
Sources
What links here
No node links to this node yet.