Math 2.0

statement theorem

Equivalence classes form a partition

Statement

Let ∼\sim be an equivalence relation on a set AA. Then the set {[a]∣a∈A}\{[a] \mid a \in A\} of equivalence classes is a partition of AA.

Remarks

Each class [a][a] is nonempty, because a∈[a]a \in [a] by reflexivity. If [a][a] and [b][b] have a common element, then a∼ba \sim b by symmetry and transitivity, so [a]=[b][a] = [b]. The left cosets of a subgroup of a group form such a partition. This fact is the key step in Lagrange's theorem.

Explanations

L1 human

The three properties of an equivalence relation are exactly what you need to sort elements into classes. Reflexivity puts each element in some class. Symmetry and transitivity stop two classes from overlapping.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What depends on this

1 node uses this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_of_a_set, Partitions and equivalence relations