Math 2.0

Concept

Invariant decomposition

Summary

The invariant decomposition is a decomposition of the elements of pin groups Pin(p,q,r)\text{Pin}(p,q,r) into orthogonal commuting elements. It is also valid in their subgroups, e.g. orthogonal, pseudo-Euclidean, conformal, and classical groups. Because the elements of Pin groups are the composition of kk oriented reflections, the invariant decomposition theorem reads

Every kk-reflection can be decomposed into ⌈k/2⌉\lceil k/2 \rceil commuting factors.

It is named the invariant decomposition because these factors are the invariants of the kk-reflection R∈Pin(p,q,r)R \in \text{Pin}(p,q,r). A well known special case is the Chasles' theorem, which states that any rigid body motion in SE(3)\text{SE}(3) can be decomposed into a rotation around, followed or preceded by a translation along, a single line. Both the rotation and the translation leave two lines invariant: the axis of rotation and the orthogonal axis of translation. Since both rotations and translations are bireflections, a more abstract statement of the theorem reads "Every quadreflection can be decomposed into commuting bireflections". In this form the statement is also valid for e.g. the spacetime algebra SO(3,1)\text{SO}(3,1), where any Lorentz transformation can be decomposed into a commuting rotation and boost.

Further reading

  1. Wikipedia, page 69262097, revision 1369992908, Invariant decomposition. adopted
About this page
TagPQ4S4KBFKM
URIm2://PQ4S4KBFKM
Kindconcept
WritingW1 stated
Same as
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W2

  • edge defines in: at least one definition (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of in: at least two examples (0 of 2)
  • edge not_instance_of in: at least one non-example (0 of 1)
  • edge specializes both: the more general notions and the special cases (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.