Proof of Grushko decomposition theorem
Proof
Proof: We give the proof assuming that F has no generator which is mapped to the identity of , for if there are such generators, they may be added to any of or .
The following general results are used in the proof.
\1. There is a one or two dimensional CW complex, Z with fundamental group F. By Van Kampen theorem, the wedge of n circles is one such space.
\2. There exists a two complex where is a point on a one cell of X such that X1 and X2 are two complexes with fundamental groups G1 and G2 respectively. Note that by the Van Kampen theorem, this implies that the fundamental group of X is .
\3. There exists a map such that the induced map on the fundamental groups is same as
For the sake of convenience, let us denote and . Since no generator of F maps to identity, the set has no loops, for if it does, these will correspond to circles of Z which map to , which in turn correspond to generators of F which go to the identity. So, the components of are contractible. In the case where has only one component, by Van Kampen's theorem, we are done, as in that case, :.
The general proof follows by reducing Z to a space homotopically equivalent to it, but with fewer components in , and thus by induction on the components of .
Such a reduction of Z is done by attaching discs along binding ties.
We call a map a binding tie if it satisfies the following properties
\1. It is monochromatic i.e. or
\2. It is a tie i.e. and lie in different components of .
\3. It is null i.e. is null homotopic in X.
Let us assume that such a binding tie exists. Let be the binding tie.
Consider the map given by . This map is a homeomorphism onto its image. Define the space as
where :x\!\!\sim y \text{ iff} \begin{cases} x=y, \mbox{ or }\\ x=\gamma (t) \text{ and } y= g(t) \text{ for some } t\in [0,1]\mbox{ or }\\ x=g (t) \text{ and } y= \gamma (t) \text{ for some } t\in [0,1] \end{cases}
Note that the space Z' deformation retracts to Z We first extend f to a function as
Since the is null homotopic, further extends to the interior of the disc, and therefore, to . Let i = 1,2. As and lay in different components of , has one less component than .
Where this leads
1 page builds on this one.
Further reading
- Wikipedia, page 18715724, revision 1354577450, Grushko theorem, section Sketch of Stalling's proof > Lemma. adopted
About this page
| Tag | E2RM9N1PV7 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://E2RM9N1PV7 |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| Proves | Grushko decomposition theorem |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- edge uses out: each node that the argument needs (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.