Math 2.0

Proof

Proof of Grushko decomposition theorem

Proof

Proof: We give the proof assuming that F has no generator which is mapped to the identity of G1∗G2G_1\ast G_2, for if there are such generators, they may be added to any of F1F_1 or F2F_2.

The following general results are used in the proof.

\1. There is a one or two dimensional CW complex, Z with fundamental group F. By Van Kampen theorem, the wedge of n circles is one such space.

\2. There exists a two complex X=X1∪X2X=X_1\cup X_2 where {p}=X1∩X2\{p\}=X_1\cap X_2 is a point on a one cell of X such that X1 and X2 are two complexes with fundamental groups G1 and G2 respectively. Note that by the Van Kampen theorem, this implies that the fundamental group of X is G1∗G2G_1\ast G_2.

\3. There exists a map f:Z→Xf:Z\rightarrow X such that the induced map f∗f_\ast on the fundamental groups is same as ϕ\phi

For the sake of convenience, let us denote f−1(X1)=:Z1f^{-1}(X_1)=:Z_1 and f−1(X2)=:Z2f^{-1}(X_2)=:Z_2. Since no generator of F maps to identity, the set Z1∩Z2Z_1\cap Z_2 has no loops, for if it does, these will correspond to circles of Z which map to p∈Xp\in X, which in turn correspond to generators of F which go to the identity. So, the components of Z1∩Z2Z_1\cap Z_2 are contractible. In the case where Z1∩Z2Z_1\cap Z_2 has only one component, by Van Kampen's theorem, we are done, as in that case, :F=Π1(Z1)∗Π1(Z2)F=\Pi_1(Z_1)\ast\Pi_1(Z_2).

The general proof follows by reducing Z to a space homotopically equivalent to it, but with fewer components in Z1∩Z2Z_1\cap Z_2, and thus by induction on the components of Z1∩Z2Z_1\cap Z_2.

Such a reduction of Z is done by attaching discs along binding ties.

We call a map γ:[0,1]→Z\gamma :[0,1]\rightarrow Z a binding tie if it satisfies the following properties

\1. It is monochromatic i.e. γ([0,1])⊆Z1\gamma([0,1])\subseteq Z_1 or γ([0,1])⊆Z2\gamma([0,1])\subseteq Z_2

\2. It is a tie i.e. γ(0)\gamma(0) and γ(1)\gamma(1) lie in different components of Z1∩Z2Z_1\cap Z_2.

\3. It is null i.e. f∘γ([0,1])f \circ \gamma([0,1]) is null homotopic in X.

Let us assume that such a binding tie exists. Let γ\gamma be the binding tie.

Consider the map g:[0,1]→D2g:[0,1]\rightarrow D^2 given by g(t)=eitg(t)= e^{it}. This map is a homeomorphism onto its image. Define the space Z′Z' as

Z′=Z∐ ⁣D2/ ⁣∼Z'= Z \coprod\! D^2/\! \sim where :x\!\!\sim y \text{ iff} \begin{cases} x=y, \mbox{ or }\\ x=\gamma (t) \text{ and } y= g(t) \text{ for some } t\in [0,1]\mbox{ or }\\ x=g (t) \text{ and } y= \gamma (t) \text{ for some } t\in [0,1] \end{cases}

Note that the space Z' deformation retracts to Z We first extend f to a function ′′f′′:Z∐∂D2/ ⁣∼''f'':Z\coprod \partial D^2/\!\sim as

f′′(x)={f(x), x∈Zp otherwise.f''(x) = \begin{cases}f(x),\ x\in Z\\ p \text{ otherwise.}\end{cases}

Since the f(γ)f(\gamma) is null homotopic, f′′f'' further extends to the interior of the disc, and therefore, to Z′Z'. Let Zi′=f′−1(Xi)Z_i' = f'^{-1}(X_i) i = 1,2. As γ(0)\gamma(0) and γ(1)\gamma(1) lay in different components of Z1∩Z2Z_1\cap Z_2, Z1′∩Z2′Z_1' \cap Z_2' has one less component than Z1∩Z2Z_1\cap Z_2.

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Wikipedia, page 18715724, revision 1354577450, Grushko theorem, section Sketch of Stalling's proof > Lemma. adopted
About this page
TagE2RM9N1PV7
URIm2://E2RM9N1PV7
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
ProvesGrushko decomposition theorem
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • edge uses out: each node that the argument needs (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.