Proof of Tarski's theorem about choice
Proof
The goal is to prove that the axiom of choice is implied by the statement "for every infinite set ". It is known that the well-ordering theorem is equivalent to the axiom of choice; thus it is enough to show that the statement implies that for every set there exists a well-order.
Since the collection of all ordinals such that there exists a surjective function from to the ordinal is a set, there exists an infinite ordinal, such that there is no surjective function from to We assume without loss of generality that the sets and are disjoint. By the initial assumption, thus there exists a bijection
For every it is impossible that because otherwise we could define a surjective function from to Therefore, there exists at least one ordinal such that so the set is not empty.
We can define a new function: This function is well defined since is a non-empty set of ordinals, and so has a minimum. For every the sets and are disjoint. Therefore, we can define a well order on for every we define since the image of that is, is a set of ordinals and therefore well ordered.
Where this leads
1 page builds on this one.
Further reading
- Wikipedia, page 320578, revision 1336022373, Tarski's theorem about choice, section Proof. adopted
About this page
| Tag | DJEW8ZHQWT |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://DJEW8ZHQWT |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| Proves | Tarski's theorem about choice |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- edge uses out: each node that the argument needs (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.