Redundant proof
Summary
In mathematical logic, a redundant proof is a proof that has a subset that is a shorter proof of the same result. In other words, a proof is redundant if it has more proof steps than are actually necessary to prove the result. Formally, a proof of is considered redundant if there exists another proof of such that (i.e. ) and where is the number of nodes in .
Further reading
- Wikipedia, page 42158532, revision 1191444096, Redundant proof. adopted
About this page
| Tag | FFH6M3M077 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://FFH6M3M077 |
| Kind | concept |
| Writing | W1 stated |
| Same as | |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W2
- edge defines in: at least one definition (0 of 1)
- edge instance_of in: at least two examples (0 of 2)
- edge not_instance_of in: at least one non-example (0 of 1)
- edge specializes both: the more general notions and the special cases (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.