Math 2.0

Lemma

Strengthened version of Van Kampen's lemma

Statement

Moreover, the above proof shows that the conclusion of Van Kampen's lemma can be strengthened as follows. Part 1 can be strengthened to say that if ๐’Ÿโ€‰\mathcal D\, is a Van Kampen diagram of area n with boundary label w then there exists a representation (โ™ ) for w as a product in F(A) of exactly n conjugates of elements of Rโˆ—. Part 2 can be strengthened to say that if w is freely reduced and admits a representation (โ™ ) as a product in F(A) of n conjugates of elements of Rโˆ— then there exists a reduced Van Kampen diagram with boundary label w and of area at most n.

Further reading

  1. Wikipedia, page 18871460, revision 1368818220, Van Kampen diagram, section Van Kampen lemma > Strengthened version of Van Kampen's lemma. adopted
About this page
TagXGZ08QFJV8
URIm2://XGZ08QFJV8
Kindstatement, lemma
WritingW0 stub
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status XGZ08QFJV8.
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown ยท JSON ยท Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • edge uses out: each definition that the statement needs (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.