Uncorrelated random variables that are not independent
Counterexample
The claim "uncorrelated random variables are independent" is false. Here are two counterexamples. First: let and . Then , since the odd moments of are . But and are not independent: , while . Second: let , and let be independent of with . Put . Then and . But , so and are not independent.
Remarks
In the second example, both and are normal, but the pair is not multivariate normal: is with probability . So the rule "uncorrelated implies independent" needs a joint normal law, not only normal marginals. The direction that is true is that independent variables are uncorrelated.
Explanations
L1 human
Covariance only detects linear relations. In the first example, is a function of , so it depends on completely, but the relation is not linear. So zero correlation does not mean that two variables have nothing to do with each other.
What this node needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- edge refutes or not_instance_of out (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.
Sources
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misconceptions_about_the_normal_distribution, A symmetric example
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncorrelatedness, Examples of dependence without correlation
What links here
No node links to this node yet.