Math 2.0

Combinatorics Extremal combinatorics Theorem

Ahlswede–Daykin inequality

Builds on Distributive lattice

Statement

Let LL be a finite distributive lattice with join ∨\vee and meet ∧\wedge. Let f1,f2,f3,f4 ⁣:L→[0,∞)f_1, f_2, f_3, f_4 \colon L \to [0, \infty) be functions such that f1(x) f2(y)≤f3(x∨y) f4(x∧y)for all x,y∈L.f_1(x) \, f_2(y) \le f_3(x \vee y) \, f_4(x \wedge y) \quad \text{for all } x, y \in L. For A,B⊆LA, B \subseteq L, let A∨B={a∨b:a∈A,b∈B}A \vee B = \set{a \vee b : a \in A, b \in B}, let A∧B={a∧b:a∈A,b∈B}A \wedge B = \set{a \wedge b : a \in A, b \in B}, and let f(A)=∑a∈Af(a)f(A) = \sum_{a \in A} f(a). Then f1(A) f2(B)≤f3(A∨B) f4(A∧B)for all A,B⊆L.f_1(A) \, f_2(B) \le f_3(A \vee B) \, f_4(A \wedge B) \quad \text{for all } A, B \subseteq L.

Remarks

It is also called the four functions theorem. Every finite distributive lattice embeds in the lattice of subsets of a finite set, so it suffices to treat the power set of {1,…,n}\set{1, \ldots, n}. The proof is by induction on nn; the case n=1n = 1 is a direct check of an inequality between four products of nonnegative numbers.

Example: with all four functions equal to 11, the hypothesis holds and the conclusion is ∣A∣ ∣B∣≤∣A∨B∣ ∣A∧B∣|A| \, |B| \le |A \vee B| \, |A \wedge B| for any subsets A,BA, B of LL. Taking f1=f2=f3=f4=μf_1 = f_2 = f_3 = f_4 = \mu for a function μ\mu with μ(x)μ(y)≤μ(x∨y)μ(x∧y)\mu(x)\mu(y) \le \mu(x \vee y)\mu(x \wedge y) gives the FKG inequality and, as a special case, the Harris inequality.

Going deeper

For a student

The four functions theorem is the common source of the correlation inequalities of combinatorics. It contains the FKG inequality, the Harris inequality and Kleitman's lemma on monotone families of sets. These are used for random graphs, percolation and the statistical mechanics of spin systems, where increasing events tend to occur together.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 2 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Distributive lattice concept
  2. Ahlswede–Daykin inequality statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahlswede–Daykin_inequality
About this page
Tag4085B8A528
URIm2://4085B8A528
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC05D05, 06D99, 60E15
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 4085B8A528.
AboutDistributive lattice
UsesDistributive lattice
Same as
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.