Math 2.0

statement theorem

Classification of the Platonic solids

Statement

Let PP be a Platonic solid whose faces have pp sides each, with qq faces at each vertex. Then {p,q}\{p, q\} is one of {3,3},{4,3},{3,4},{5,3},{3,5}.\{3, 3\}, \quad \{4, 3\}, \quad \{3, 4\}, \quad \{5, 3\}, \quad \{3, 5\}. Each of these five cases occurs, by the regular tetrahedron, the cube, the regular octahedron, the regular dodecahedron and the regular icosahedron. Up to similarity, there is exactly one Platonic solid for each case.

Remarks

A proof: let VV, EE and FF be the numbers of vertices, edges and faces. Then pF=2E=qVpF = 2E = qV, and Euler's formula V−E+F=2V - E + F = 2 gives 1p+1q=12+1E>12\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{q} = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{E} > \frac{1}{2}. With p,q≥3p, q \geq 3, this inequality has exactly the five solutions above. A geometric proof uses the angles: at each vertex, the qq face angles (p−2)πp\frac{(p - 2)\pi}{p} must add up to less than 2π2\pi.

History

Theaetetus, a contemporary of Plato, described all five solids. He may have given the first proof that no other convex regular polyhedra exist. Euclid's Elements contains a geometric proof.

Explanations

L1 human

Only five perfectly regular convex solids exist. At each corner, at least three faces meet, and their angles must add up to less than a full turn. This leaves room only for three, four or five triangles, three squares or three pentagons.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 4 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Platonic solid concept
  2. Polyhedron concept
  3. Euler's polyhedron formula statement
  4. Classification of the Platonic solids statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platonic_solid, Classification
  2. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platonic_solid, Topological proof
  3. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platonic_solid, History