Math 2.0

statement axiom

Continuum hypothesis

Statement

There is no set SS with ℵ0<∣S∣<2ℵ0\aleph_0 < |S| < 2^{\aleph_0}. Equivalently, with the axiom of choice, 2ℵ0=ℵ12^{\aleph_0} = \aleph_1.

Remarks

In words: each infinite subset of R\mathbb{R} is countable or equinumerous with R\mathbb{R}. The hypothesis is independent of ZFC: if ZFC is consistent, then ZFC proves neither the hypothesis nor its negation. The generalized continuum hypothesis says that 2ℵα=ℵα+12^{\aleph_\alpha} = \aleph_{\alpha + 1} for each ordinal α\alpha.

History

Georg Cantor proposed the hypothesis in 1878. It was the first of the problems that David Hilbert presented in 1900. Kurt Gödel showed in 1940 that ZFC does not refute it, and Paul Cohen showed in 1963 that ZFC does not prove it.

Explanations

L1 human

Cantor showed that R\mathbb{R} is larger than N\mathbb{N}. The continuum hypothesis says that no size lies strictly between them. The usual axioms of set theory cannot decide whether this is true.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuum_hypothesis, lead section