statement proposition
Converse of Wilson's theorem
Statement
Let be an integer with . If , then is a prime number.
Remarks
With Wilson's theorem, this gives: an integer is prime if and only if . The proof: if with , then divides . A congruence would give , which is false. In fact for each composite , and . This primality test is not practical, because needs about multiplications.
Explanations
L1 human
For a composite number , a factor of appears in the product . So the product cannot leave the remainder . For example, .
What this node needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.
What this needs
To read this node, read these 5 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.
- no evidence level
- Divisibility definition
- Congruence modulo n definition
- Prime number definition
- Wilson's theorem statement
- Converse of Wilson's theorem statement
Sources
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson%27s_theorem, Composite modulus
What links here
No node links to this node yet.