Math 2.0

Category theory; homological algebra Definition

Derived category

Builds on Abelian categoryChain complexChain mapQuasi-isomorphismLocalization of a categoryHomotopy category of chain complexes

Definition

Let π’œ\mathcal{A} be an abelian category and let Ch⁑(π’œ)\operatorname{Ch}(\mathcal{A}) be the category of chain complexes in π’œ\mathcal{A} and chain maps. The derived category of π’œ\mathcal{A} is the localization of Ch⁑(π’œ)\operatorname{Ch}(\mathcal{A}) at the class of quasi-isomorphisms. That is, it is a category D(π’œ)D(\mathcal{A}) with a functor Q ⁣:Ch⁑(π’œ)β†’D(π’œ)Q \colon \operatorname{Ch}(\mathcal{A}) \to D(\mathcal{A}) such that:

  1. Q(f)Q(f) is an isomorphism for every quasi-isomorphism ff;
  2. every functor F ⁣:Ch⁑(π’œ)β†’π’žF \colon \operatorname{Ch}(\mathcal{A}) \to \mathcal{C} that sends quasi-isomorphisms to isomorphisms factors as F=G∘QF = G \circ Q for a unique functor G ⁣:D(π’œ)β†’π’žG \colon D(\mathcal{A}) \to \mathcal{C}.

Remarks

The localization can be computed in two steps: first pass to the homotopy category K(π’œ)K(\mathcal{A}), then invert quasi-isomorphisms there by a calculus of fractions. A morphism Xβ†’YX \to Y in D(π’œ)D(\mathcal{A}) is then represented by a roof X←sXβ€²β†’YX \xleftarrow{s} X' \to Y with ss a quasi-isomorphism. For general π’œ\mathcal{A} the morphisms between two objects might not form a set. They do form a set for module categories, and for bounded below complexes when π’œ\mathcal{A} has enough injectives. Example: over β„€\Z, let CC be β„€β†’β‹…2β„€\Z \xrightarrow{\cdot 2} \Z in degrees 11 and 00, and let β„€/2β„€\Z/2\Z sit in degree 00. The quotient map C0=β„€β†’β„€/2β„€C_0 = \Z \to \Z/2\Z is a chain map, and it is a quasi-isomorphism since H0(C)β‰…β„€/2β„€H_0(C) \cong \Z/2\Z and H1(C)=0H_1(C) = 0; so Cβ‰…β„€/2β„€C \cong \Z/2\Z in D(π’œ)D(\mathcal{A}). Non-example: CC and β„€/2β„€\Z/2\Z are not isomorphic in K(π’œ)K(\mathcal{A}), since every chain map β„€/2β„€β†’C\Z/2\Z \to C is zero, because Hom⁑(β„€/2β„€,β„€)=0\Hom(\Z/2\Z, \Z) = 0; so K(π’œ)K(\mathcal{A}) is not the derived category. The bounded variants DbD^b, D+D^+ and Dβˆ’D^- are defined in the same way from bounded complexes.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 7 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Abelian category concept
  2. Chain complex concept
  3. Chain map concept
  4. Homotopy category of chain complexes concept
  5. Localization of a category concept
  6. Quasi-isomorphism concept
  7. Derived category definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derived_category
About this page
TagPCEVB6XV6J
URIm2://PCEVB6XV6J
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC18G80, 14F08, 13D09
DefinesDerived category
UsesAbelian category, Chain complex, Chain map, Quasi-isomorphism, Localization of a category, Homotopy category of chain complexes
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown Β· JSON Β· Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.