Math 2.0

Category theory; homological algebra Definition

Double complex

Builds on Additive categoryChain complexBiproductModule over a ring

Definition

Let ๐’œ\mathcal{A} be an additive category, for example the category of modules over a ring. A double complex in ๐’œ\mathcal{A} consists of objects Cp,qC_{p,q} for all integers p,qp, q and morphisms dp,qhโ€‰โฃ:Cp,qโ†’Cpโˆ’1,q,dp,qvโ€‰โฃ:Cp,qโ†’Cp,qโˆ’1,d^h_{p,q} \colon C_{p,q} \to C_{p-1,q}, \qquad d^v_{p,q} \colon C_{p,q} \to C_{p,q-1}, called the horizontal and vertical differentials, such that:

  1. dhโˆ˜dh=0d^h \circ d^h = 0;
  2. dvโˆ˜dv=0d^v \circ d^v = 0;
  3. dhโˆ˜dv+dvโˆ˜dh=0d^h \circ d^v + d^v \circ d^h = 0.

Suppose that the needed direct sums exist, for example for modules. Then the total complex is the chain complex with Tot(C)n=โจp+q=nCp,q,d=dh+dv.\mathrm{Tot}(C)_n = \bigoplus_{p + q = n} C_{p,q}, \qquad d = d^h + d^v.

Remarks

The three conditions give d2=(dh)2+dhdv+dvdh+(dv)2=0d^2 = (d^h)^2 + d^h d^v + d^v d^h + (d^v)^2 = 0, so the total complex is a complex. The sums are finite, and exist in any additive category, when only finitely many Cp,qC_{p,q} with p+q=np + q = n are nonzero for each nn. Some texts ask instead that the squares commute, dhdv=dvdhd^h d^v = d^v d^h, and put the sign into the total complex as d=dh+(โˆ’1)pdvd = d^h + (-1)^p d^v; the two conventions are equivalent. Using products instead of direct sums gives a second total complex, which differs when infinitely many terms are nonzero on a diagonal.

Example: for chain complexes (Pโˆ™,dP)(P_\bullet, d^P) and (Qโˆ™,dQ)(Q_\bullet, d^Q) of modules over a commutative ring, set Cp,q=PpโŠ—QqC_{p,q} = P_p \otimes Q_q, dh=dPโŠ—1d^h = d^P \otimes 1 and dv=(โˆ’1)pโ€‰1โŠ—dQd^v = (-1)^p \, 1 \otimes d^Q on Cp,qC_{p,q}. For xโˆˆPpx \in P_p and yโˆˆQqy \in Q_q, dhdv(xโŠ—y)=(โˆ’1)pโ€‰dPxโŠ—dQyd^h d^v (x \otimes y) = (-1)^p\, d^P x \otimes d^Q y and dvdh(xโŠ—y)=(โˆ’1)pโˆ’1โ€‰dPxโŠ—dQyd^v d^h (x \otimes y) = (-1)^{p-1}\, d^P x \otimes d^Q y, so condition 3 holds.

Non-example: the same data without the sign, dv=1โŠ—dQd^v = 1 \otimes d^Q, fails condition 3 in general, since then dhdv+dvdh=2โ€‰dPโŠ—dQd^h d^v + d^v d^h = 2\, d^P \otimes d^Q; over โ„ค\Z with P=Q=(โ„คโ†’1โ„ค)P = Q = (\Z \xrightarrow{1} \Z) this is 2โ‰ 02 \ne 0.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 5 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Additive category concept
  2. Biproduct concept
  3. Chain complex concept
  4. Module over a ring concept
  5. Double complex definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_complex
About this page
TagQBK2MFPJZ7
URIm2://QBK2MFPJZ7
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC18G35
DefinesDouble complex
UsesAdditive category, Chain complex, Biproduct, Module over a ring
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown ยท JSON ยท Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.