Math 2.0

General algebraic systems Definition

Equational logic

Builds on IdentitySubstitutionTerm

Definition

Let σ\sigma be a signature with only function symbols and let XX be a set of variables. Let Σ\Sigma be a set of identities over σ\sigma and XX. The identities derivable from Σ\Sigma in equational logic, written Σ⊢s≈t\Sigma \vdash s \approx t, form the smallest set of identities that satisfies the following rules, for all terms s,t,u,si,tis, t, u, s_i, t_i:

  1. (axioms) every identity in Σ\Sigma is derivable;
  2. (reflexivity) t≈tt \approx t is derivable;
  3. (symmetry) if s≈ts \approx t is derivable, so is t≈st \approx s;
  4. (transitivity) if s≈ts \approx t and t≈ut \approx u are derivable, so is s≈us \approx u;
  5. (replacement) if si≈tis_i \approx t_i is derivable for i=1,…,ni = 1, \ldots, n and ff is a function symbol of arity nn, then f(s1,…,sn)≈f(t1,…,tn)f(s_1, \ldots, s_n) \approx f(t_1, \ldots, t_n) is derivable;
  6. (substitution) if s≈ts \approx t is derivable and θ\theta is a substitution, then sθ≈tθs\theta \approx t\theta is derivable.

Remarks

A derivation is a finite list of identities, each one in Σ\Sigma or obtained from earlier ones by a rule. Each rule preserves truth in every algebra, so every derivable identity holds in every algebra that satisfies Σ\Sigma; Birkhoff's completeness theorem gives the converse.

Example: let Σ={x+0≈x, x+y≈y+x}\Sigma = \set{x + 0 \approx x, \ x + y \approx y + x}. Rule 6 applied to the second axiom with θ={x↦0, y↦x}\theta = \set{x \mapsto 0, \ y \mapsto x} gives 0+x≈x+00 + x \approx x + 0, and rule 4 with the first axiom gives Σ⊢0+x≈x\Sigma \vdash 0 + x \approx x.

Non-example: x+y≈yx + y \approx y is not derivable from Σ\Sigma. The group (ℤ,+,0)(\Z, +, 0) satisfies Σ\Sigma, and every derivable identity holds in it, but 1+0≠01 + 0 \ne 0.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Identity concept
  2. Substitution concept
  3. Term concept
  4. Equational logic definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equational_logic
About this page
TagQ6WPMDYWN2
URIm2://Q6WPMDYWN2
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC08B05, 03B10
DefinesEquational logic
UsesIdentity, Substitution, Term
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.