Math 2.0

Relativity and gravitational theory Definition

Ernst equation

Builds on Weyl–Lewis–Papapetrou coordinatesVacuum solutionLaplace's equation

Definition

Let gg be a stationary axisymmetric metric in Weyl–Lewis–Papapetrou coordinates, g=−f(dt−ω dϕ)2+f−1(e2γ(dρ2+dz2)+ρ2dϕ2),g = -f\left(dt - \omega\, d\phi\right)^2 + f^{-1}\left(e^{2\gamma}\left(d\rho^2 + dz^2\right) + \rho^2 d\phi^2\right), with f>0f > 0, ω\omega, γ\gamma functions of (ρ,z)(\rho, z). The twist potential ψ\psi is a function of (ρ,z)(\rho, z) with ∂ρψ=−f2ρ ∂zω,∂zψ=f2ρ ∂ρω,\partial_\rho \psi = -\frac{f^2}{\rho}\, \partial_z \omega, \qquad \partial_z \psi = \frac{f^2}{\rho}\, \partial_\rho \omega, and the Ernst potential is ℰ=f+iψ\mathcal{E} = f + i\psi. Let ∇\nabla and ∇2=∂ρ2+ρ−1∂ρ+∂z2\nabla^2 = \partial_\rho^2 + \rho^{-1}\partial_\rho + \partial_z^2 be the gradient and the Laplacian of flat ℝ3\R^3 in cylindrical coordinates, applied to functions of (ρ,z)(\rho, z). The Ernst equation is (Re⁡ℰ)∇2ℰ=∇ℰ⋅∇ℰ,\left(\operatorname{Re}\mathcal{E}\right) \nabla^2 \mathcal{E} = \nabla\mathcal{E} \cdot \nabla\mathcal{E}, where the product ∇ℰ⋅∇ℰ\nabla\mathcal{E}\cdot\nabla\mathcal{E} has no complex conjugation.

Remarks

The twist potential exists locally when ∂ρ(ρ−1f2∂ρω)+∂z(ρ−1f2∂zω)=0\partial_\rho(\rho^{-1} f^2 \partial_\rho\omega) + \partial_z(\rho^{-1} f^2 \partial_z\omega) = 0, which is one of the vacuum equations; sign conventions for ψ\psi vary between texts. The metric gg is a vacuum solution if and only if ℰ\mathcal{E} solves the Ernst equation and γ\gamma solves a pair of first-order equations. These can be integrated once ℰ\mathcal{E} is known.

Example: in the static case ω=0\omega = 0 one has ψ=0\psi = 0 and ℰ=f=e2U\mathcal{E} = f = e^{2U}. Then ∇f=2f∇U\nabla f = 2f\nabla U and ∇2f=2f∇2U+4f∣∇U∣2\nabla^2 f = 2f\nabla^2 U + 4f\abs{\nabla U}^2, so the Ernst equation becomes 2f2∇2U=02f^2\nabla^2 U = 0, that is, Laplace's equation ∇2U=0\nabla^2 U = 0. For instance U=−M/ρ2+z2U = -M / \sqrt{\rho^2 + z^2} with M>0M > 0 is harmonic away from the origin, so ℰ=e2U\mathcal{E} = e^{2U} solves the Ernst equation (the Curzon solution).

Non-example: ℰ=z2\mathcal{E} = z^2. Here Re⁡ℰ ∇2ℰ=2z2\operatorname{Re}\mathcal{E}\, \nabla^2\mathcal{E} = 2z^2 while ∇ℰ⋅∇ℰ=4z2\nabla\mathcal{E}\cdot\nabla\mathcal{E} = 4z^2, so the equation fails wherever z≠0z \ne 0.

An equivalent form uses ξ\xi with ℰ=ξ−1ξ+1\mathcal{E} = \frac{\xi - 1}{\xi + 1}, which gives (ξξˉ−1)∇2ξ=2ξˉ ∇ξ⋅∇ξ\left(\xi\bar\xi - 1\right)\nabla^2\xi = 2\bar\xi\, \nabla\xi\cdot\nabla\xi.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Laplace's equation concept
  2. Vacuum solution concept
  3. Weyl–Lewis–Papapetrou coordinates concept
  4. Ernst equation definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_equation
About this page
TagE94TDB7DJM
URIm2://E94TDB7DJM
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC83C15, 83C05, 35Q75
DefinesErnst equation
UsesWeyl–Lewis–Papapetrou coordinates, Vacuum solution, Laplace's equation
Changed3 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.