Math 2.0

statement proposition

Finite intersection of open sets is open

Statement

Let (X,d)(X, d) be a metric space, let n≥1n \ge 1 be an integer, and let U1,…,UnU_1, \ldots, U_n be open subsets of XX. Then the intersection U1∩⋯∩UnU_1 \cap \cdots \cap U_n is open in XX.

Remarks

Proof: let xx be in the intersection. For each kk there is εk>0\varepsilon_k > 0 with B(x,εk)⊆UkB(x, \varepsilon_k) \subseteq U_k. Then ε=min⁡(ε1,…,εn)>0\varepsilon = \min(\varepsilon_1, \ldots, \varepsilon_n) > 0 and B(x,ε)B(x, \varepsilon) lies in each UkU_k. The statement is false for infinite families: in R\mathbb{R}, the intersection of the open intervals (−1/n,1/n)(-1/n, 1/n) for n≥1n \ge 1 is {0}\{0\}, which is not open. In a general topological space, this property is one of the axioms.

Explanations

L1 human

Each open set gives its own small ball about the point, and the smallest of these finitely many balls fits in all the sets. With infinitely many sets, the radii can shrink to zero, and then no ball is left.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_set, Properties