Math 2.0

statement lemma

First Borel–Cantelli lemma

Statement

Let A1,A2,…A_1, A_2, \dots be events in a probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P) with ∑n=1∞P(An)<∞\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} P(A_n) < \infty. Then P(lim sup⁡n→∞An)=0,wherelim sup⁡n→∞An=⋂n=1∞⋃m=n∞Am.P\left(\limsup_{n \to \infty} A_n\right) = 0, \quad \text{where} \quad \limsup_{n \to \infty} A_n = \bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty} \bigcup_{m=n}^{\infty} A_m. So almost surely, only finitely many of the events AnA_n occur.

Remarks

The event lim sup⁡nAn\limsup_n A_n is the set of outcomes that lie in infinitely many AnA_n. It is written {An i.o.}\{A_n \text{ i.o.}\}, for "infinitely often". Proof: for each nn, P(lim sup⁡mAm)≤P(⋃m≥nAm)≤∑m≥nP(Am)P(\limsup_m A_m) \le P\left(\bigcup_{m \ge n} A_m\right) \le \sum_{m \ge n} P(A_m) by Boole's inequality. The right side tends to 00 as n→∞n \to \infty. The lemma needs no independence. The second Borel–Cantelli lemma gives a partial converse for independent events. The lemma holds in each measure space: if ∑nμ(An)<∞\sum_n \mu(A_n) < \infty, then μ(lim sup⁡nAn)=0\mu(\limsup_n A_n) = 0.

History

The lemma is named after Émile Borel and Francesco Paolo Cantelli.

Explanations

L1 human

If the chances of the events add up to a finite number, then after some time none of them happens any more, with probability 11. For example, if P(An)=1/n2P(A_n) = 1/n^2, then only finitely many AnA_n occur.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What depends on this

1 node uses this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borel–Cantelli_lemma, Statement of lemma for probability spaces