Math 2.0

statement lemma

Second Borel–Cantelli lemma

Statement

Let A1,A2,…A_1, A_2, \dots be mutually independent events in a probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P) with ∑n=1∞P(An)=∞\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} P(A_n) = \infty. Then P(lim sup⁡n→∞An)=1.P\left(\limsup_{n \to \infty} A_n\right) = 1. So almost surely, infinitely many of the events AnA_n occur.

Remarks

Proof: the complement of lim sup⁡nAn\limsup_n A_n is ⋃n⋂m≥nAmc\bigcup_n \bigcap_{m \ge n} A_m^c. By independence and 1−x≤e−x1 - x \le e^{-x}, P(⋂m=nNAmc)=∏m=nN(1−P(Am))≤exp⁡(−∑m=nNP(Am))P\left(\bigcap_{m = n}^{N} A_m^c\right) = \prod_{m=n}^{N} (1 - P(A_m)) \le \exp\left(-\sum_{m=n}^{N} P(A_m)\right). The right side tends to 00 as N→∞N \to \infty. So each ⋂m≥nAmc\bigcap_{m \ge n} A_m^c has probability 00, and so does their union. Independence is necessary. For An=AA_n = A with 0<P(A)<10 < P(A) < 1 for all nn, the sum diverges but P(lim sup⁡nAn)=P(A)<1P(\limsup_n A_n) = P(A) < 1. With the first lemma, it follows that for independent events, P(lim sup⁡nAn)P(\limsup_n A_n) is 00 or 11.

Explanations

L1 human

If independent events have chances that add up to infinity, then infinitely many of them happen, with probability 11. For example, in an infinite sequence of tosses of a fair coin, the pattern "ten heads in a row" appears infinitely often.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borel–Cantelli_lemma, Converse result