Math 2.0

Category theory; homological algebra Homological algebra: complexes and exact sequences Lemma

Five lemma

Builds on Abelian categoryExact sequenceCommutative diagramMonomorphismEpimorphismFour lemma

Statement

Let 𝒜\mathcal{A} be an abelian category, such as the category of modules over a ring. Consider a commutative diagram A→B→C→D→E↓l↓m↓n↓p↓qA′→B′→C′→D′→E′\begin{array}{ccccccccc} A & \to & B & \to & C & \to & D & \to & E \\ \downarrow{\scriptstyle l} & & \downarrow{\scriptstyle m} & & \downarrow{\scriptstyle n} & & \downarrow{\scriptstyle p} & & \downarrow{\scriptstyle q} \\ A' & \to & B' & \to & C' & \to & D' & \to & E' \end{array} in 𝒜\mathcal{A} whose two rows are exact. Suppose that mm and pp are isomorphisms, that ll is an epimorphism and that qq is a monomorphism. Then nn is an isomorphism.

Remarks

The lemma is the conjunction of the two halves of the four lemma. The left four columns, with m,pm, p monomorphisms and ll an epimorphism, show that nn is a monomorphism. The right four columns, with m,pm, p epimorphisms and qq a monomorphism, show that nn is an epimorphism. Each half is a diagram chase. A typical use: a map between two short exact sequences that is an isomorphism on the outer terms is an isomorphism on the middle term, by taking A=A′=E=E′=0A = A' = E = E' = 0. The existence of the map nn making the diagram commute is essential: 0→ℤ/2ℤ→ℤ/4ℤ→ℤ/2ℤ→00 \to \Z/2\Z \to \Z/4\Z \to \Z/2\Z \to 0 and 0→ℤ/2ℤ→ℤ/2ℤ⊕ℤ/2ℤ→ℤ/2ℤ→00 \to \Z/2\Z \to \Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/2\Z \to \Z/2\Z \to 0 have isomorphic outer terms, but ℤ/4ℤ≇ℤ/2ℤ⊕ℤ/2ℤ\Z/4\Z \not\cong \Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/2\Z.

Going deeper

For a student

The five lemma is used constantly to show that a natural map is an isomorphism. One fits the map into a ladder of long exact sequences, for example in homology, where the other maps are already known to be isomorphisms. This is how one proves that a map of spaces that induces isomorphisms on the homology of pieces induces an isomorphism on the whole, as in Mayer–Vietoris arguments. It also proves the splitting lemma and the invariance of derived functors under the choice of resolution.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 21 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Abelian category concept
  2. Adjoint functors concept
  3. Commutative diagram concept
  4. Epimorphism concept
  5. Exact functor concept
  6. Exact sequence concept
  7. Full and faithful functors concept
  8. Functor concept
  9. Generator concept
  10. Grothendieck category concept
  11. Hom functor concept
  12. Module over a ring concept
  13. Monomorphism concept
  14. Pseudo-element concept
  15. Ring concept
  16. Serre subcategory concept
  17. Category of modules example
  18. Gabriel–Popescu theorem statement
  19. Freyd–Mitchell embedding theorem statement
  20. Four lemma statement
  21. Five lemma statement

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_lemma
About this page
TagW6AVEAW2WR
URIm2://W6AVEAW2WR
Kindstatement, lemma
WritingW0 stub
MSC18G35, 18E10
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status W6AVEAW2WR.
AboutExact sequence
UsesAbelian category, Exact sequence, Commutative diagram, Monomorphism, Epimorphism, Four lemma
Same as
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by