Math 2.0

Quantum theory Quantization Theorem

Groenewold's theorem

Builds on Canonical quantizationPoisson bracketHermite functions

Statement

Let โ„>0\hbar > 0 and let ๐’ซโ‰คk\mathcal{P}_{\le k} be the space of real polynomials of degree at most kk in two variables q,pq, p, with the Poisson bracket {f,g}=โˆ‚fโˆ‚qโˆ‚gโˆ‚pโˆ’โˆ‚fโˆ‚pโˆ‚gโˆ‚q\{f, g\} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial q}\frac{\partial g}{\partial p} - \frac{\partial f}{\partial p}\frac{\partial g}{\partial q}. Let VV be the space of functions xโ†ฆh(x)eโˆ’x2/2x \mapsto h(x) e^{-x^2/2} on โ„\R with hh a complex polynomial, which is the span of the Hermite functions. Let XX and PP be the operators on VV given by (Xฯˆ)(x)=xฯˆ(x)(X\psi)(x) = x\psi(x) and Pฯˆ=โˆ’iโ„โ€‰ฯˆโ€ฒP\psi = -i\hbar\, \psi'. Then there is no linear map Qโ€‰โฃ:๐’ซโ‰ค4โ†’Endโก(V)Q \colon \mathcal{P}_{\le 4} \to \End(V) such that:

  1. Q(1)=IQ(1) = I, Q(q)=XQ(q) = X and Q(p)=PQ(p) = P;
  2. [Q(f),Q(g)]=iโ„โ€‰Q({f,g})[Q(f), Q(g)] = i\hbar\, Q(\{f, g\}) for all f,gโˆˆ๐’ซโ‰ค3f, g \in \mathcal{P}_{\le 3}.

Remarks

The idea of the proof: since VV is an irreducible module over the algebra generated by XX and PP, an operator on VV that commutes with both is a scalar. Using this and clause 2 with ff or gg of degree 11, the map QQ is forced, step by step. It must agree with Weyl quantization on all polynomials of degree at most 33. The polynomial q2p2q^2 p^2 then can be reached in two ways, since {q3,p3}=9q2p2\{q^3, p^3\} = 9 q^2 p^2 and {q2p,qp2}=3q2p2\{q^2 p, q p^2\} = 3 q^2 p^2. The two commutators 19[Q(q3),Q(p3)]\frac{1}{9}[Q(q^3), Q(p^3)] and 13[Q(q2p),Q(qp2)]\frac13[Q(q^2 p), Q(q p^2)], computed with the Weyl operators, differ by a nonzero multiple of โ„3I\hbar^3 I, which contradicts the linearity of QQ.

Example of what does work: on ๐’ซโ‰ค2\mathcal{P}_{\le 2} alone, Weyl quantization satisfies clause 2 exactly, since the bracket of two quadratic polynomials is again quadratic. So the obstruction appears only at degree 33 and 44.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem explains why canonical quantization needs extra choices beyond the canonical commutation relations. Weyl quantization satisfies the bracket rule only up to terms of order โ„2\hbar^2: the Moyal bracket replaces the Poisson bracket. Deformation quantization accepts this and builds a star product whose commutator agrees with the Poisson bracket at first order in โ„\hbar. Van Hove later extended the result to more general phase spaces and quantization settings.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Canonical quantization concept
  2. Hermite functions concept
  3. Poisson bracket concept
  4. Groenewold's theorem statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_quantization
About this page
TagEDPPWXMXA4
URIm2://EDPPWXMXA4
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC81S08, 81S30
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status EDPPWXMXA4.
AboutCanonical quantization
UsesCanonical quantization, Poisson bracket, Hermite functions
Changed3 November 2026

Markdown ยท JSON ยท Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.