Math 2.0

statement theorem

Induction from an arbitrary base case

Statement

Let mm be a natural number and let P(n)P(n) be a property of natural numbers nn with n≥mn \ge m. Suppose that P(m)P(m) holds. Suppose also that for each natural number n≥mn \ge m, P(n)P(n) implies P(n+1)P(n + 1). Then P(n)P(n) holds for every natural number n≥mn \ge m.

Remarks

The proof applies ordinary induction to the property Q(k)Q(k): "P(m+k)P(m + k) holds". For example, induction from m=4m = 4 shows that 2n≥n22^n \ge n^2 for every natural number n≥4n \ge 4.

Explanations

L1 human

Sometimes a property is false for small numbers and true from some point on. Then you start the induction at that point instead of at 00. The dominoes start falling at domino number mm, and the dominoes before it do not matter.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 8 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Definition by recursion concept
  2. Mathematical induction concept
  3. Natural numbers object
  4. Peano axioms concept
  5. Successor function definition
  6. Addition of natural numbers definition
  7. Order on the natural numbers definition
  8. Induction from an arbitrary base case statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_induction, Base case other than 0 or 1