Math 2.0

Order, lattices, ordered algebraic structures Modular and complemented lattices Theorem

Jordan–Hölder theorem for modular lattices

Builds on Modular latticeCovering relationMaximal chain

Statement

Let LL be a modular lattice and let a≤ba \le b in LL. Write x⋖yx \lessdot y when yy covers xx. For u≤vu \le v in LL, write [u,v]={z∈L:u≤z≤v}[u, v] = \set{z \in L : u \le z \le v}. Two such intervals are transposed if they have the form [x∧y,x][x \wedge y, x] and [y,x∨y][y, x \vee y] for some x,y∈Lx, y \in L, in either order. Two intervals are projective if they are joined by a finite sequence of intervals in which each consecutive pair is transposed.

Let a=x0⋖x1⋖⋯⋖xm=banda=y0⋖y1⋖⋯⋖yn=ba = x_0 \lessdot x_1 \lessdot \cdots \lessdot x_m = b \quad\text{and}\quad a = y_0 \lessdot y_1 \lessdot \cdots \lessdot y_n = b be two finite maximal chains from aa to bb. Then m=nm = n, and there is a permutation σ\sigma of {1,…,m}\set{1, \dots, m} such that [xi−1,xi][x_{i-1}, x_i] is projective to [yσ(i)−1,yσ(i)][y_{\sigma(i)-1}, y_{\sigma(i)}] for each ii.

Remarks

The proof is by induction on mm. If x1=y1x_1 = y_1, apply induction to the interval [x1,b][x_1, b]. Otherwise x1x_1 and y1y_1 both cover a=x1∧y1a = x_1 \wedge y_1, and modularity makes the transposed intervals [y1,x1∨y1][y_1, x_1 \vee y_1] and [a,x1][a, x_1] isomorphic, so x1∨y1x_1 \vee y_1 covers both x1x_1 and y1y_1. Choosing a maximal chain from x1∨y1x_1 \vee y_1 to bb and applying induction in [x1,b][x_1, b] and in [y1,b][y_1, b] gives the result.

Example: the lattice of submodules of a module MM is modular. For submodules XX and YY, the transposed intervals give the isomorphism X/(X∩Y)≅(X+Y)/YX / (X \cap Y) \cong (X + Y) / Y, so projective intervals of length one give isomorphic simple quotients. So the theorem yields the Jordan–Hölder theorem for modules: two composition series of a module have the same length and isomorphic factors up to order.

Without modularity the equal-length conclusion can fail. In the pentagon lattice N5, the maximal chains 0<a<c<10 < a < c < 1 and 0<b<10 < b < 1 have lengths 33 and 22.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem shows that modular lattices satisfy the Jordan–Dedekind chain condition on every interval of finite length, so such intervals have a well-defined length. For submodule lattices it recovers the Jordan–Hölder theorem for modules, with projectivity of intervals giving isomorphism of factors. The Jordan–Hölder theorem for groups is a close relative, with subnormal series in place of chains of submodules. The same equal-length conclusion holds in semimodular lattices, which is why matroids and geometric lattices have a rank function.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Covering relation concept
  2. Maximal chain concept
  3. Modular lattice concept
  4. Jordan–Hölder theorem for modular lattices statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition_series
About this page
TagBCG5KM83AP
URIm2://BCG5KM83AP
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC06C05, 06B05
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status BCG5KM83AP.
AboutModular lattice
UsesModular lattice, Covering relation, Maximal chain
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.