Math 2.0

K-theory Definition

KK-theory

Builds on C*-algebraHilbert C*-module

Definition

Let AA be a separable C*-algebra and BB a ฯƒ\sigma-unital C*-algebra, both with the trivial grading. For a Hilbert C*-module EE over BB, let โ„’(E)\mathcal{L}(E) be the C*-algebra of adjointable operators on EE. Let ๐’ฆ(E)\mathcal{K}(E) be its ideal of compact operators, the closed span of the operators ฮธx,y(z)=xโŸจy,zโŸฉ\theta_{x, y}(z) = x \langle y, z \rangle. A Kasparov (A,B)(A, B)-module is a triple (E,ฯ†,F)(E, \varphi, F) where:

  1. E=E(0)โŠ•E(1)E = E^{(0)} \oplus E^{(1)} is a countably generated โ„ค/2\Z/2-graded Hilbert BB-module;
  2. ฯ†โ€‰โฃ:Aโ†’โ„’(E)\varphi \colon A \to \mathcal{L}(E) is a โˆ—*-homomorphism into the even operators, those that preserve E(0)E^{(0)} and E(1)E^{(1)};
  3. Fโˆˆโ„’(E)F \in \mathcal{L}(E) is odd, that is, it maps E(0)E^{(0)} to E(1)E^{(1)} and E(1)E^{(1)} to E(0)E^{(0)};
  4. for all aโˆˆAa \in A, the operators (F2โˆ’1)ฯ†(a)(F^2 - 1)\varphi(a), (Fโˆ’Fโˆ—)ฯ†(a)(F - F^*)\varphi(a) and Fฯ†(a)โˆ’ฯ†(a)FF \varphi(a) - \varphi(a) F lie in ๐’ฆ(E)\mathcal{K}(E).

Two Kasparov (A,B)(A, B)-modules are homotopic if they are the images, under evaluation at 00 and at 11, of a Kasparov (A,C([0,1],B))(A, C([0, 1], B))-module. The group KK(A,B)KK(A, B) is the set of homotopy classes of Kasparov (A,B)(A, B)-modules, with addition given by the direct sum of modules.

Remarks

The direct sum makes KK(A,B)KK(A, B) an abelian group; modules with all operators in clause 4 equal to 00 represent 00. Example: a โˆ—*-homomorphism ฯ†โ€‰โฃ:Aโ†’B\varphi \colon A \to B gives the class of (BโŠ•0,ฯ†,0)(B \oplus 0, \varphi, 0), where BB is a Hilbert module over itself with ๐’ฆ(B)=B\mathcal{K}(B) = B; clause 4 holds since ฯ†(a)โˆˆB=๐’ฆ(B)\varphi(a) \in B = \mathcal{K}(B). Example: for A=B=โ„‚A = B = \C, a module is essentially a Hilbert space E(0)โŠ•E(1)E^{(0)} \oplus E^{(1)} with an odd Fredholm operator, and [(E,idโก,F)]โ†ฆindโก(FโˆฃE(0))[(E, \id, F)] \mapsto \operatorname{ind}(F|_{E^{(0)}}) gives KK(โ„‚,โ„‚)โ‰…โ„คKK(\C, \C) \cong \Z. Non-example: (โ„“2(โ„•)โŠ•0,idโก,0)(\ell^2(\N) \oplus 0, \id, 0) as an (โ„‚,โ„‚)(\C, \C)-module fails clause 4, since (02โˆ’1)โ‹…1=โˆ’1(0^2 - 1) \cdot 1 = -1 is not compact on an infinite-dimensional space. The odd groups are KK1(A,B)=KK(A,C0(โ„)โŠ—B)KK^1(A, B) = KK(A, C_0(\R) \otimes B), and Bott periodicity holds in both variables.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 3 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. C*-algebra concept
  2. Hilbert C*-module concept
  3. KK-theory definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KK-theory
About this page
TagKT3K5YMWB3
URIm2://KT3K5YMWB3
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC19K35, 46L80
DefinesKK-theory
UsesC*-algebra, Hilbert C*-module
Changed3 November 2026

Markdown ยท JSON ยท Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.