Math 2.0

Probability theory and stochastic processes Special processes Theorem

Little's law

Builds on Queueing theoryM/M/1 queue

Statement

Consider a system, empty at time 00, that customers enter at times 0≤a1≤a2≤⋯0 \le a_1 \le a_2 \le \cdots and leave at times dk≥akd_k \ge a_k, with ak→∞a_k \to \infty. Let Wk=dk−akW_k = d_k - a_k be the time customer kk spends in the system, let A(t)=#{k:ak≤t}A(t) = \#\set{k : a_k \le t}, and let L(t)=#{k:ak≤t<dk}L(t) = \#\set{k : a_k \le t < d_k} be the number in the system at time tt. Assume that the limits λ=lim⁡t→∞A(t)tandW=lim⁡n→∞1n∑k=1nWk\lambda = \lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{A(t)}{t} \quad \text{and} \quad W = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac1n \sum_{k=1}^n W_k exist and are finite. Then the limit L=lim⁡t→∞1t∫0tL(s) dsL = \lim_{t \to \infty} \frac1t \int_0^t L(s)\, ds exists and L=λW.L = \lambda W.

Remarks

The proof compares two ways of computing the total time spent in the system up to time tt. The integral ∫0tL(s) ds\int_0^t L(s)\, ds lies between the sum of the WkW_k over customers who have left by time tt and the sum over customers who have arrived by time tt. Dividing by tt, both bounds tend to λW\lambda W; the upper bound needs the fact that Wn/an→0W_n / a_n \to 0, which follows from the two hypotheses. Example: in the stable M/M/1 queue with λ=3\lambda = 3 and μ=4\mu = 4, the mean number in the system is L=3L = 3, so the mean time in the system is W=L/λ=1W = L / \lambda = 1. The law needs no assumption on the arrival law, the service law, the number of servers or the order of service.

Going deeper

For a student

In queueing theory one usually computes one of LL and WW from a model and gets the other one free. For the M/M/1 queue, the stationary law gives L=ρ/(1−ρ)L = \rho/(1 - \rho), and Little's law gives W=1/(μ−λ)W = 1/(\mu - \lambda). Applied to the waiting room alone, it links the mean queue length and the mean waiting time before service. In the stochastic setting it holds for stationary systems with expectations in place of time averages.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 3 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. M/M/1 queue example
  2. Queueing theory concept
  3. Little's law statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little's_law
About this page
TagJN2YME6F4A
URIm2://JN2YME6F4A
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC60K25, 90B22
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status JN2YME6F4A.
AboutQueueing theory
UsesQueueing theory, M/M/1 queue
Same as
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.