Math 2.0

statement corollary

Local homeomorphism from the inverse function theorem

Statement

Let U⊆RnU \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n be open, and let f ⁣:U→Rnf \colon U \to \mathbb{R}^n be of class C1C^1 with Df(x)Df(x) invertible for each x∈Ux \in U. Then each a∈Ua \in U has an open neighbourhood V⊆UV \subseteq U such that f(V)f(V) is open and ff restricted to VV is a homeomorphism onto f(V)f(V). In particular, ff is an open map: f(O)f(O) is open for each open set O⊆UO \subseteq U.

Remarks

This follows from the inverse function theorem, since a C1C^1 inverse is continuous. For each aa, the hypothesis is needed only at aa: if Df(a)Df(a) is invertible, ff is a homeomorphism from a neighbourhood of aa onto an open set. A local homeomorphism need not be injective. The map (x,y)↦(excos⁡y,exsin⁡y)(x, y) \mapsto (e^x \cos y, e^x \sin y) is a local homeomorphism from R2\mathbb{R}^2 onto R2∖{0}\mathbb{R}^2 \setminus \{0\}, but it is not injective.

Explanations

L1 human

Where the derivative is invertible, the map neither folds nor crushes space in a small region. So small open sets go to open sets, and the map can be undone continuously on each small region.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_function_theorem, Several variables