Math 2.0

Differential geometry Riemannian and pseudo-Riemannian manifolds Theorem

Nash embedding theorems

Builds on Riemannian manifoldRiemannian metric

Statement

Let (M,g)(M, g) be a Riemannian manifold of dimension mm. Write ⟨⋅,⋅⟩\ip{\cdot}{\cdot} for the Euclidean inner product on ℝn\R^n. An isometric embedding of (M,g)(M, g) into ℝn\R^n is an embedding f ⁣:M→ℝnf \colon M \to \R^n with ⟨dfp(v),dfp(w)⟩=gp(v,w)\ip{df_p(v)}{df_p(w)} = g_p(v, w) for all p∈Mp \in M and v,w∈TpMv, w \in T_pM.

  1. (C1C^1 theorem, Nash and Kuiper.) Let n≥m+1n \ge m + 1 and let f ⁣:M→ℝnf \colon M \to \R^n be a smooth embedding that is short, that is ∣dfp(v)∣2<gp(v,v)\abs{df_p(v)}^2 < g_p(v, v) for all pp and all nonzero v∈TpMv \in T_pM. Then for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 there is a C1C^1 embedding f~ ⁣:M→ℝn\tilde f \colon M \to \R^n that is isometric for gg and satisfies ∣f~(p)−f(p)∣<ε\abs{\tilde f(p) - f(p)} < \varepsilon for all p∈Mp \in M.
  2. (CkC^k theorem, Nash.) Let 3≤k≤∞3 \le k \le \infty and let gg be of class CkC^k. Then (M,g)(M, g) has an isometric embedding of class CkC^k into ℝn\R^n. Here n=m(3m+11)/2n = m(3m + 11)/2 if MM is compact, and n=m(m+1)(3m+11)/2n = m(m + 1)(3m + 11)/2 otherwise.

Remarks

Part 2 is proved by solving the nonlinear system f∗⟨⋅,⋅⟩=gf^*\ip{\cdot}{\cdot} = g with an iteration that combines Newton's method with smoothing operators, the Nash–Moser technique. Part 1 is proved by convex integration: one adds many small fast oscillations that increase lengths in a controlled way. An example of part 1: the flat square torus ℝ2/ℤ2\R^2 / \Z^2 has a C1C^1 isometric embedding into ℝ3\R^3. It has no C2C^2 isometric embedding there, because a compact surface in ℝ3\R^3 has a point of positive Gaussian curvature, while the flat torus has curvature 00. So the low codimension in part 1 really needs the low regularity C1C^1. Nash proved part 1 with n≥m+2n \ge m + 2, and Kuiper extended it to n≥m+1n \ge m + 1.

Going deeper

For a student

The Whitney embedding theorem embeds a manifold in ℝ2m\R^{2m} but ignores the metric; Nash's theorems make the embedding respect the metric at the cost of more dimensions or less smoothness. The C1C^1 theorem is an early instance of the h-principle: a short embedding can be deformed into an isometric one by arbitrarily small moves. The bounds on nn in part 2 have been lowered by later work, but the existence statement is what is used in practice.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 3 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Riemannian manifold concept
  2. Riemannian metric concept
  3. Nash embedding theorems statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_embedding_theorems
About this page
Tag8YQJQXQHVE
URIm2://8YQJQXQHVE
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC53C42, 53B20
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 8YQJQXQHVE.
AboutRiemannian manifold
UsesRiemannian manifold, Riemannian metric
Same as
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.