Math 2.0

Commutative algebra Localization Proposition

Prime ideals of a localization

Builds on LocalizationMultiplicative setPrime idealExtension and contraction of ideals

Statement

Let RR be a commutative ring, let S⊆RS \subseteq R be a multiplicative set, and let λ ⁣:R→S−1R\lambda \colon R \to S^{-1}R, a↦a/1a \mapsto a/1, be the canonical map to the localization. Then the maps 𝔮↦λ−1(𝔮),𝔭↦S−1𝔭={a/s:a∈𝔭, s∈S}\mathfrak q \mapsto \lambda^{-1}(\mathfrak q), \qquad \mathfrak p \mapsto S^{-1}\mathfrak p = \set{a/s : a \in \mathfrak p, \ s \in S} are mutually inverse bijections between the prime ideals 𝔮\mathfrak q of S−1RS^{-1}R and the prime ideals 𝔭\mathfrak p of RR with 𝔭∩S=∅\mathfrak p \cap S = \emptyset. Both maps preserve inclusion.

Remarks

The preimage of a prime ideal under a ring homomorphism is prime, and λ−1(𝔮)\lambda^{-1}(\mathfrak q) misses SS because elements of SS become units. Conversely, if 𝔭∩S=∅\mathfrak p \cap S = \emptyset, then a/s∈S−1𝔭a/s \in S^{-1}\mathfrak p forces ua∈𝔭ua \in \mathfrak p for some u∈Su \in S, hence a∈𝔭a \in \mathfrak p since u∉𝔭u \notin \mathfrak p. This shows λ−1(S−1𝔭)=𝔭\lambda^{-1}(S^{-1}\mathfrak p) = \mathfrak p and that S−1𝔭S^{-1}\mathfrak p is a proper prime ideal. Finally every ideal JJ of S−1RS^{-1}R is the extension of its contraction, which gives S−1λ−1(𝔮)=𝔮S^{-1}\lambda^{-1}(\mathfrak q) = \mathfrak q.

Example: for R=ℤR = \Z and S={1,2,4,…}S = \set{1, 2, 4, \ldots}, the prime ideals of ℤ[1/2]\Z[1/2] are (0)(0) and pℤ[1/2]p\Z[1/2] for the odd primes pp; the prime 2ℤ2\Z meets SS and disappears.

For S=R∖𝔭S = R \setminus \mathfrak p with 𝔭\mathfrak p prime, the primes of R𝔭R_{\mathfrak p} correspond to the primes of RR contained in 𝔭\mathfrak p. So R𝔭R_{\mathfrak p} has the unique maximal ideal 𝔭R𝔭\mathfrak p R_{\mathfrak p}, that is, it is a local ring.

The hypothesis that 𝔭\mathfrak p be prime matters: for a non-prime ideal II with I∩S=∅I \cap S = \emptyset one can have λ−1(S−1I)≠I\lambda^{-1}(S^{-1}I) \ne I. For instance, with R=ℤR = \Z, I=6ℤI = 6\Z and S={1,2,4,…}S = \set{1, 2, 4, \ldots}, one gets λ−1(S−1I)=3ℤ\lambda^{-1}(S^{-1}I) = 3\Z.

Going deeper

For a student

This result is the reason why localization is a "local" operation on the spectrum. For S={1,f,f2,…}S = \set{1, f, f^2, \ldots} it identifies Spec⁡Rf\operatorname{Spec} R_f with the basic open set D(f)D(f). For S=R∖𝔭S = R \setminus \mathfrak p it identifies Spec⁡R𝔭\operatorname{Spec} R_{\mathfrak p} with the primes inside 𝔭\mathfrak p, so the height of 𝔭\mathfrak p equals the Krull dimension of R𝔭R_{\mathfrak p}. Combined with the description of the primes of a quotient R/IR/I, it describes the primes of rings such as R𝔭/IR𝔭R_{\mathfrak p}/I R_{\mathfrak p} for an ideal II of RR.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 5 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Extension and contraction of ideals concept
  2. Localization concept
  3. Multiplicative set concept
  4. Prime ideal concept
  5. Prime ideals of a localization statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Localization_(commutative_algebra)
About this page
TagW8QNZZ4QJS
URIm2://W8QNZZ4QJS
Kindstatement, proposition
WritingW0 stub
MSC13B30, 13A15
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status W8QNZZ4QJS.
AboutLocalization, Prime ideal
UsesLocalization, Multiplicative set, Prime ideal, Extension and contraction of ideals
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.