Math 2.0

Mathematical logic and foundations Definition

Priority method

Builds on Computably enumerable setComputable function

Definition

A finite-injury priority construction builds sets A⊆ℕA \subseteq \N by a computable process in stages s=0,1,2,…s = 0, 1, 2, \ldots, as follows.

  1. The goal is a list of requirements R0,R1,R2,…R_0, R_1, R_2, \ldots, and RiR_i has higher priority than RjR_j when i<ji < j.
  2. At each stage ss, finitely many numbers are added to the finite approximation AsA_s, so A0⊆A1⊆⋯A_0 \subseteq A_1 \subseteq \cdots and A=⋃sAsA = \bigcup_s A_s is computably enumerable.
  3. At a stage, an action taken for RiR_i may undo the work done for some RjR_j with j>ij > i; then RjR_j is injured and starts again.
  4. An action for RjR_j never injures any RiR_i with i<ji < j.

The construction is finite-injury if each requirement is injured only finitely often and acts only finitely often. The priority method is the use of such constructions to prove the existence of computably enumerable sets with given properties. It also covers extensions in which requirements may be injured infinitely often.

Remarks

Example: the proof of the Friedberg–Muchnik theorem is a finite-injury construction with requirements A≠ΦeBA \ne \Phi_e^B and B≠ΦeAB \ne \Phi_e^A. By induction on ii, after some stage no requirement before RiR_i acts, so RiR_i is injured only finitely often and is met.

Non-example: a construction of AA that at each stage asks whether a given program halts is not a priority construction in this sense. It is not a computable process, so it does not make AA computably enumerable.

The proof that a finite-injury construction succeeds is usually an induction on the priority order. Infinite-injury methods, such as those used for the Sacks density theorem, allow some requirements to be injured infinitely often.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 3 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Computable function concept
  2. Computably enumerable set concept
  3. Priority method definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_degree
About this page
TagY1N80NR1CG
URIm2://Y1N80NR1CG
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC03D25, 03D28
DefinesPriority method
UsesComputably enumerable set, Computable function
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.