Math 2.0

statement proposition

Product of the gcd and the lcm

Statement

Let aa and bb be natural numbers. Then gcd⁡(a,b)⋅lcm⁡(a,b)=ab\gcd(a, b) \cdot \operatorname{lcm}(a, b) = a b, where gcd⁡\gcd is the greatest common divisor and lcm⁡\operatorname{lcm} is the least common multiple.

Remarks

For integers aa and bb of any sign, the same argument gives gcd⁡(a,b)⋅lcm⁡(a,b)=∣ab∣\gcd(a, b) \cdot \operatorname{lcm}(a, b) = |a b|. Thus lcm⁡(a,b)=ab/gcd⁡(a,b)\operatorname{lcm}(a, b) = a b / \gcd(a, b) when aa and bb are not both 00. This is the usual way to compute the lcm, with the Euclidean algorithm. For example, gcd⁡(4,6)=2\gcd(4, 6) = 2, lcm⁡(4,6)=12\operatorname{lcm}(4, 6) = 12 and 2⋅12=24=4⋅62 \cdot 12 = 24 = 4 \cdot 6.

Explanations

L1 human

Think of the prime factors of aa and bb. The gcd takes, for each prime, the smaller of the two exponents, and the lcm takes the larger one. The smaller exponent plus the larger exponent is the sum of the two exponents. So the product of the gcd and the lcm has the same prime factors as aba b.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 4 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Divisibility definition
  2. Greatest common divisor definition
  3. Least common multiple definition
  4. Product of the gcd and the lcm statement

What depends on this

1 node uses this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Least_common_multiple, Using the greatest common divisor