Proof of Lyndon's interpolation theorem
Proof
We present here a constructive proof of the Craig interpolation theorem for propositional logic.
Since the above proof is constructive, one may extract an algorithm for computing interpolants. Using this algorithm, if n = |atoms(φ') − atoms(ψ)|, then the interpolant ρ has O(exp(n)) more logical connectives than φ (see Big O Notation for details regarding this assertion). Similar constructive proofs may be provided for the basic modal logic K, intuitionistic logic and μ-calculus, with similar complexity measures.
Craig interpolation can be proved by other methods as well. However, these proofs are generally non-constructive:
- model-theoretically, via Robinson's joint consistency theorem: in the presence of compactness, negation and conjunction, Robinson's joint consistency theorem and Craig interpolation are equivalent.
- proof-theoretically, via a sequent calculus. If cut elimination is possible and as a result the subformula property holds, then Craig interpolation is provable via induction over the derivations.
- algebraically, using amalgamation theorems for the variety of algebras representing the logic.
- via translation to other logics enjoying Craig interpolation.
Where this leads
1 page builds on this one.
Further reading
- Wikipedia, page 2056790, revision 1321826961, Craig interpolation, section Proof of Craig's interpolation theorem. adopted
About this page
| Tag | FAG05D5RT9 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://FAG05D5RT9 |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| Proves | Lyndon's interpolation theorem |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- edge uses out: each node that the argument needs (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.