Math 2.0

Manifolds and cell complexes Theorem

Reidemeister's theorem

Builds on KnotLink

Statement

Let LL be a tame link in ℝ3\R^3. A link diagram of LL is a projection of LL to a plane that is injective except at finitely many transverse double points, called crossings. At each crossing the diagram records which strand passes over. The three Reidemeister moves are local changes of a diagram inside a small disk:

  1. type I adds or removes a single twist with one crossing;
  2. type II adds or removes two crossings where one strand passes entirely over another;
  3. type III slides a strand over or under a crossing of two other strands.

Two diagrams represent equivalent links if and only if they are related by a finite sequence of Reidemeister moves and isotopies of the plane.

Remarks

Each move is realized by a deformation of the link near the small disk, which gives the easy direction. For the converse, an equivalence of tame links can be taken to be a finite sequence of triangle moves on polygonal links. Such a move replaces one edge by the two other edges of a triangle, or the reverse, when the triangle meets the link only in these edges. The effect of each such move on a diagram can be split into Reidemeister moves. The theorem was proved by Kurt Reidemeister in 1927, and independently by James Alexander and Garland Briggs. It is the basis of most proofs that a quantity computed from a diagram is a knot invariant: one checks invariance under the three moves. For example, tricolorability and the Kauffman bracket are proved invariant in this way, the bracket up to a factor under the first move. All three types are needed: for instance, the number of crossings modulo 22 is unchanged by moves of type II and III, but changed by a move of type I.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem turns knot theory into a combinatorial subject. To build a knot invariant, one defines a quantity from a diagram and checks that the three moves leave it unchanged. This is how the Jones polynomial, the Alexander polynomial via skein relations, and colourings by groups or quandles are shown to be invariants. The theorem gives no bound on the number of moves needed, so by itself it does not give an algorithm to decide whether two diagrams represent the same knot.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 3 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Knot concept
  2. Link concept
  3. Reidemeister's theorem statement

Where this leads

4 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reidemeister_move
About this page
TagT3HAGWYKK7
URIm2://T3HAGWYKK7
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC57K10
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status T3HAGWYKK7.
AboutKnot, Link
UsesKnot, Link
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by