Math 2.0

Proposition

Russell's paradox 1902

Statement

In 1902 Russell sent a letter to Frege pointing out that Frege's 1879 Begriffsschrift allowed a function to be an argument of itself: "On the other hand, it may also be that the argument is determinate and the function indeterminate . . .." From this unconstrained situation Russell was able to form a paradox:

"You state ... that a function, too, can act as the indeterminate element. This I formerly believed, but now this view seems doubtful to me because of the following contradiction. Let w be the predicate: to be a predicate that cannot be predicated of itself. Can w be predicated of itself?"

Frege responded promptly that "Your discovery of the contradiction caused me the greatest surprise and, I would almost say, consternation, since it has shaken the basis on which I intended to build arithmetic".

From this point forward development of the foundations of mathematics became an exercise in how to dodge "Russell's paradox", framed as it was in "the bare [set-theoretic] notions of set and element".

Further reading

  1. Wikipedia, page 36595472, revision 1359939615, History of the function concept, section Development of the set-theoretic definition > Russell's paradox 1902. adopted
About this page
TagQ0JSW6W3R7
URIm2://Q0JSW6W3R7
Kindstatement, proposition
WritingW0 stub
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status Q0JSW6W3R7.
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • edge uses out: each definition that the statement needs (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.