statement theorem
Strong law of large numbers
Statement
Let be i.i.d. real random variables with and . Let . Then almost surely:
Remarks
The strong law implies the weak law, because almost sure convergence implies convergence in probability. A short proof exists if : then , and the first Borel–Cantelli lemma applies. Etemadi proved that the result holds when the are only pairwise independent and identically distributed. Conversely, if , then almost surely does not converge to a finite limit.
Explanations
L1 human
The strong law says more than the weak law. Almost every infinite sequence of trials has sample means that converge to the true mean. So, with probability , the fraction of heads in an infinite sequence of fair coin tosses tends to .
What this node needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.
What depends on this
2 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.
- Weak law of large numbers 0BFDHF2H7N
- Law of large numbers 0ZVEAYVRC3
Sources
What links here
Used by
- Law of large numbers 0ZVEAYVRC3