Math 2.0

statement theorem

Sum of independent normal random variables

Statement

Let X∼N(μ1,σ12)X \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu_1, \sigma_1^2) and Y∼N(μ2,σ22)Y \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu_2, \sigma_2^2) be independent, with σ12,σ22>0\sigma_1^2, \sigma_2^2 > 0. Then X+Y∼N(μ1+μ2, σ12+σ22).X + Y \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu_1 + \mu_2, \, \sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2).

Remarks

Proof with characteristic functions: φX+Y(t)=φX(t)φY(t)=exp⁡(i(μ1+μ2)t−(σ12+σ22)t2/2)\varphi_{X+Y}(t) = \varphi_X(t) \varphi_Y(t) = \exp(i(\mu_1 + \mu_2)t - (\sigma_1^2 + \sigma_2^2) t^2 / 2). By the uniqueness theorem, this fixes the law. By induction, a sum of nn independent normal variables is normal. Its mean is the sum of the means and its variance is the sum of the variances. With the rule for aX+baX + b, every linear combination a1X1+⋯+anXna_1 X_1 + \dots + a_n X_n of independent normal variables is normal, if some ai≠0a_i \ne 0. The independence condition is necessary. Two normal variables that are not jointly normal can have a sum that is not normal.

Explanations

L1 human

Adding independent normal errors gives another normal error. The means add, and the variances add, but the standard deviations do not add.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sum_of_normally_distributed_random_variables, Independent random variables