Math 2.0

Commutative algebra Definition

Tensor product of modules

Builds on Commutative ringModule over a ringLinear mapMultilinear mapFree module

Definition

Let RR be a commutative ring and let MM, NN be RR-modules. A map β ⁣:M×N→P\beta \colon M \times N \to P to an RR-module PP is RR-bilinear if it is RR-linear in each variable when the other is fixed. A tensor product of MM and NN is an RR-module M⊗RNM \otimes_R N with an RR-bilinear map ⊗ ⁣:M×N→M⊗RN\otimes \colon M \times N \to M \otimes_R N, written (m,n)↦m⊗n(m, n) \mapsto m \otimes n. It must satisfy this universal property. For every RR-module PP and every RR-bilinear map β ⁣:M×N→P\beta \colon M \times N \to P there is exactly one RR-linear map φ ⁣:M⊗RN→P\varphi \colon M \otimes_R N \to P with φ(m⊗n)=β(m,n)\varphi(m \otimes n) = \beta(m, n) for all m∈Mm \in M and n∈Nn \in N.

Remarks

A tensor product exists and is unique up to a unique isomorphism compatible with the maps ⊗\otimes. One construction is the free module on the set M×NM \times N modulo the submodule generated by the elements (m+m′,n)−(m,n)−(m′,n)(m + m', n) - (m, n) - (m', n), (m,n+n′)−(m,n)−(m,n′)(m, n + n') - (m, n) - (m, n'), (rm,n)−r(m,n)(rm, n) - r(m, n) and (m,rn)−r(m,n)(m, rn) - r(m, n). The elements m⊗nm \otimes n generate M⊗RNM \otimes_R N, but a general element is a finite sum ∑imi⊗ni\sum_i m_i \otimes n_i. Standard isomorphisms are R⊗RN≅NR \otimes_R N \cong N, M⊗RN≅N⊗RMM \otimes_R N \cong N \otimes_R M, and Rm⊗RRn≅RmnR^m \otimes_R R^n \cong R^{mn}.

Example: for integers a,b≥1a, b \ge 1, ℤ/aℤ⊗ℤℤ/bℤ≅ℤ/dℤ\Z/a\Z \otimes_\Z \Z/b\Z \cong \Z/d\Z with d=gcd⁡(a,b)d = \gcd(a, b). The map (x,y)↦xy mod d(x, y) \mapsto xy \bmod d is well defined and bilinear, so it gives a surjection onto ℤ/dℤ\Z/d\Z; conversely 1⊗11 \otimes 1 generates and is killed by aa and bb, hence by dd.

Non-example: the module M⊕NM \oplus N with the map (m,n)↦(m,n)(m, n) \mapsto (m, n) is not a tensor product when MM and NN are nonzero, because this map is not bilinear. For instance, with M=N=ℤM = N = \Z, it sends (2,1)(2, 1) to (2,1)(2, 1), while bilinearity would require 2⋅(1,1)=(2,2)2 \cdot (1, 1) = (2, 2).

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 6 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Commutative ring concept
  2. Free module concept
  3. Linear map concept
  4. Module over a ring concept
  5. Multilinear map concept
  6. Tensor product of modules definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor_product_of_modules
About this page
TagSMFZN9E2ZB
URIm2://SMFZN9E2ZB
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC13C05, 15A69, 16D10
DefinesTensor product of modules
UsesCommutative ring, Module over a ring, Linear map, Multilinear map, Free module
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.