Several complex variables and analytic spaces Theorem
Yau–Tian–Donaldson conjecture
Builds on Kähler–Einstein metricHermitian manifoldCalabi conjectureGromov–Hausdorff convergence
Statement
Let be a Fano manifold, that is a compact complex manifold whose anticanonical line bundle is ample. Then admits a Kähler–Einstein metric if and only if the pair is K-polystable.
Here K-polystable means the following. A test configuration of is a -equivariant degeneration of with a line bundle extending a power of . For every normal test configuration, the Donaldson–Futaki invariant is nonnegative. Moreover, it vanishes only for normal test configurations that are products of with twisted by a -action on .
Remarks
This form of the conjecture, for Fano manifolds, was proved by Xiuxiong Chen, Simon Donaldson and Song Sun. The direction "Kähler–Einstein implies K-polystable" is the easier one. The converse uses the continuity method with metrics having cone singularities along a divisor, and Gromov–Hausdorff limits of these metrics, which are shown to be algebraic varieties.
Example: the blow-up of at one point is Fano but has no Kähler–Einstein metric. Its automorphism group is not reductive, which rules out a Kähler–Einstein metric by Matsushima's theorem, and a test configuration coming from a -action has negative Donaldson–Futaki invariant. By contrast with the Fubini–Study metric is Kähler–Einstein and K-polystable.
The general conjecture asks for a constant scalar curvature Kähler metric in on a polarized manifold , under a suitable notion of K-stability. That general form is open, and the right stability notion for it is still discussed.
Going deeper
For a student
The negative and zero cases of the Kähler–Einstein problem follow from the Calabi conjecture methods with no obstruction. In the Fano case there are obstructions, such as the Futaki invariant and Matsushima's theorem, and K-stability collects them all. The statement links a nonlinear partial differential equation to geometric invariant theory, in the spirit of the Hitchin–Kobayashi correspondence for vector bundles. After the proof, much work has gone into deciding K-stability of explicit Fano manifolds by algebraic means.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 9 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Differential form concept
- Gromov–Hausdorff convergence concept
- Hermitian manifold concept
- Kähler–Einstein metric concept
- Ricci curvature concept
- Exterior derivative concept
- Closed and exact forms concept
- Calabi conjecture statement
- Yau–Tian–Donaldson conjecture statement
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | DHYSPSYSCB |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://DHYSPSYSCB |
| Kind | statement, theorem |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 32Q20, 53C55, 14J45 |
| Status | This copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status DHYSPSYSCB. |
| About | Kähler–Einstein metric |
| Uses | Kähler–Einstein metric, Hermitian manifold, Calabi conjecture, Gromov–Hausdorff convergence |
| Changed | 2 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.