Math 2.0

statement theorem

Zeckendorf's theorem

Statement

Let FkF_k be the Fibonacci numbers, and let NN be a positive integer. Then there is a unique finite set {c1,…,cr}\{c_1, \dots, c_r\} of integers, with r≥1r \ge 1, such that N=Fc1+Fc2+⋯+Fcr,N = F_{c_1} + F_{c_2} + \dots + F_{c_r}, each ci≥2c_i \ge 2, and ci+1≥ci+2c_{i+1} \ge c_i + 2 for 1≤i<r1 \le i < r.

Remarks

The condition says that the sum uses distinct Fibonacci numbers and no two consecutive ones. The bound ci≥2c_i \ge 2 excludes F0=0F_0 = 0 and the repeated value F1=F2=1F_1 = F_2 = 1. Example: 100=89+8+3=F11+F6+F4100 = 89 + 8 + 3 = F_{11} + F_6 + F_4. The greedy method finds the representation: subtract the largest Fibonacci number that is at most NN, and repeat.

Explanations

L1 human

Each positive integer is a sum of different Fibonacci numbers, no two of them neighbours in the sequence, in exactly one way. For example, 20=13+5+220 = 13 + 5 + 2.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 2 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Fibonacci sequence example
  2. Zeckendorf's theorem statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeckendorf's_theorem, lead section