Math 2.0

statement theorem

Bézout's identity

Statement

Let aa and bb be integers, and let d=gcd⁡(a,b)d = \gcd(a, b) be their greatest common divisor. Then there are integers xx and yy such that ax+by=da x + b y = d.

Remarks

The integers xx and yy are not unique. If (x,y)(x, y) is a solution, then (x+kb/d,  y−ka/d)(x + k b / d, \; y - k a / d) is also a solution for each integer kk, when d≠0d \neq 0. The set of all integers ax+bya x + b y is the set of the multiples of dd. The extended Euclidean algorithm computes one pair (x,y)(x, y). For example, gcd⁡(12,42)=6\gcd(12, 42) = 6 and 12⋅(−3)+42⋅1=612 \cdot (-3) + 42 \cdot 1 = 6.

Explanations

L1 human

With coins of value aa and bb, and if you can give and take back coins, you can pay exactly the amount gcd⁡(a,b)\gcd(a, b). For example, with coins of 44 and 66, you pay 2=2⋅4−1⋅62 = 2 \cdot 4 - 1 \cdot 6. You cannot pay 11 this way, because each sum 4x+6y4 x + 6 y is even.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 3 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Divisibility definition
  2. Greatest common divisor definition
  3. Bézout's identity statement

What depends on this

3 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%C3%A9zout%27s_identity, lead section