Math 2.0

statement theorem

Connected subsets of the real line are intervals

Statement

Let S⊆RS \subseteq \mathbb{R}, where R\mathbb{R} has the usual topology. Then SS is connected if and only if SS is an interval, that is, for all a,b∈Sa, b \in S and all c∈Rc \in \mathbb{R} with a<c<ba < c < b, c∈Sc \in S.

Remarks

If SS is not an interval, take a<c<ba < c < b with a,b∈Sa, b \in S and c∉Sc \notin S. Then (−∞,c)(-\infty, c) and (c,∞)(c, \infty) split SS. The proof that an interval II is connected uses the completeness axiom. If open sets UU and VV split II, with a∈Ua \in U, b∈Vb \in V and a<ba < b, let cc be the supremum of the points of U∩[a,b]U \cap [a, b]. Then cc lies in neither UU nor VV. Under this definition the empty set and single points are intervals, and they are connected. The statement fails for Q\mathbb{Q}: no interval of Q\mathbb{Q} with more than one point is connected.

Explanations

L1 human

On the real line, the sets in one piece are exactly the intervals. The proof needs the completeness of R\mathbb{R}, because Q\mathbb{Q} has gaps where it can be split.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What depends on this

2 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connected_space, Examples