Math 2.0

Functional analysis Theorem

Dual of Lp

Builds on Lp spaceDual spaceIsometric isomorphismSigma-finite measure

Statement

Let (X,Σ,μ)(X, \Sigma, \mu) be a measure space, let 1≤p<∞1 \le p < \infty, and let q∈(1,∞]q \in (1, \infty] be the conjugate exponent, with 1/p+1/q=11/p + 1/q = 1. If p=1p = 1, assume moreover that μ\mu is σ-finite. For g∈Lq(μ)g \in L^q(\mu), let Λg\Lambda_g be the functional on Lp(μ)L^p(\mu) given by Λg(f)=∫Xfg dμ.\Lambda_g(f) = \int_X f g \, d\mu. Then g↦Λgg \mapsto \Lambda_g is an isometric isomorphism of Lq(μ)L^q(\mu) onto the dual space Lp(μ)∗L^p(\mu)^*.

Remarks

Hölder's inequality gives ∣Λg(f)∣≤∥f∥p∥g∥q\abs{\Lambda_g(f)} \le \norm{f}_p \norm{g}_q, so ∥Λg∥≤∥g∥q\norm{\Lambda_g} \le \norm{g}_q. For 1<p<∞1 < p < \infty, the choice f=∣g∣q−1sgn⁡g‾f = \abs{g}^{q-1} \overline{\sgn g} gives equality, so the map is an isometry. Surjectivity is the main point. Let μ\mu be σ\sigma-finite and let Λ\Lambda be a bounded functional. Then E↦Λ(𝟏E)E \mapsto \Lambda(\mathbf{1}_E), on sets of finite measure, is a set function absolutely continuous with respect to μ\mu. The Radon–Nikodym theorem gives gg. For 1<p<∞1 < p < \infty and a general measure space, one reduces to the σ\sigma-finite case, or uses the uniform convexity of LpL^p.

Example: for counting measure on ℕ\N, the theorem says that (ℓp)∗=ℓq(\ell^p)^* = \ell^q for 1≤p<∞1 \le p < \infty.

The σ\sigma-finiteness for p=1p = 1 cannot be dropped. Let X={x}X = \set{x} with μ({x})=∞\mu(\set{x}) = \infty. Then L1(μ)={0}L^1(\mu) = \set{0}, whose dual is {0}\set{0}, but L∞(μ)L^\infty(\mu) is the one-dimensional space of constants.

The case p=∞p = \infty is excluded. The map g↦Λgg \mapsto \Lambda_g from L1L^1 into (L∞)∗(L^\infty)^* is an isometry, but in general it is not onto. For example, take the functional on convergent sequences that gives the limit. By the Hahn–Banach theorem it extends to a bounded functional on ℓ∞\ell^\infty, and this extension is not given by any element of ℓ1\ell^1.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem identifies (Lp)∗=Lq(L^p)^* = L^q for 1≤p<∞1 \le p < \infty under the stated hypotheses. For 1<p<∞1 < p < \infty it follows that LpL^p is reflexive, since (Lp)∗∗=(Lq)∗=Lp(L^p)^{**} = (L^q)^* = L^p. Weak convergence in LpL^p then means convergence of ∫fng dμ\int f_n g \, d\mu for each g∈Lqg \in L^q, and bounded sequences have weakly convergent subsequences. Neither L1L^1 nor L∞L^\infty is reflexive in general, which is the source of many technical difficulties.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 5 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Dual space concept
  2. Isometric isomorphism concept
  3. Lp space concept
  4. Sigma-finite measure concept
  5. Dual of Lp statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lp_space
About this page
TagQ1V7ZNS332
URIm2://Q1V7ZNS332
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC46E30, 46B10
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status Q1V7ZNS332.
AboutLp space, Dual space
UsesLp space, Dual space, Isometric isomorphism, Sigma-finite measure
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.