Math 2.0

statement lemma

Eisenstein's lemma

Statement

Let pp be an odd prime and let aa be a positive integer with p∤ap \nmid a. Then (ap)=(−1)∑u⌊au/p⌋,\left(\frac{a}{p}\right) = (-1)^{\sum_{u} \lfloor a u / p \rfloor}, where the sum runs over the even integers u=2,4,…,p−1u = 2, 4, \dots, p - 1, and (ap)\left(\frac{a}{p}\right) is the Legendre symbol.

Remarks

For example, take p=7p = 7 and a=3a = 3. The sum is ⌊6/7⌋+⌊12/7⌋+⌊18/7⌋=0+1+2=3\lfloor 6/7 \rfloor + \lfloor 12/7 \rfloor + \lfloor 18/7 \rfloor = 0 + 1 + 2 = 3, so (37)=−1\left(\frac{3}{7}\right) = -1. A common variant holds for odd aa: then (ap)=(−1)∑k=1(p−1)/2⌊ka/p⌋\left(\frac{a}{p}\right) = (-1)^{\sum_{k=1}^{(p-1)/2} \lfloor k a / p \rfloor}. The proof is similar to the proof of Gauss's lemma. Eisenstein used the lemma in a proof of quadratic reciprocity that counts lattice points in a triangle.

Explanations

L1 human

The lemma turns the question "is aa a square modulo pp?" into a count of integer parts of fractions. The parity of the count gives the answer.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 7 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Divisibility definition
  2. Congruence modulo n definition
  3. Prime number definition
  4. Quadratic residue definition
  5. Legendre symbol definition
  6. Gauss's lemma on quadratic residues statement
  7. Eisenstein's lemma statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proofs_of_quadratic_reciprocity, Eisenstein's proof