Math 2.0

statement proposition

Finite intersection property

Statement

Let XX be a topological space and let K⊆XK \subseteq X. Then KK is compact if and only if it has the property that follows. Let (Fi)i∈I(F_i)_{i \in I} be a family of closed subsets of XX with K∩Fi1∩⋯∩Fin≠∅K \cap F_{i_1} \cap \cdots \cap F_{i_n} \neq \emptyset for all finitely many indices i1,…,in∈Ii_1, \ldots, i_n \in I. Then also K∩⋂i∈IFi≠∅K \cap \bigcap_{i \in I} F_i \neq \emptyset.

Remarks

A family of sets has the finite intersection property when each finite subfamily has a nonempty intersection. Proof: take complements. The sets X∖FiX \setminus F_i cover KK if and only if K∩⋂iFi=∅K \cap \bigcap_i F_i = \emptyset. Then use compactness via open covers. For K=XK = X: a space is compact if and only if each family of closed sets with the finite intersection property has nonempty intersection. Cantor's intersection theorem is a special case.

Explanations

L1 human

This is the dual form of compactness, with closed sets instead of open sets. Suppose that each finite subfamily of the closed sets has a common point in KK. Then the whole family has a common point in KK.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_intersection_property, Compactness