Math 2.0

statement proposition

Compactness via open covers

Statement

Let XX be a topological space and let K⊆XK \subseteq X. Then KK is compact if and only if each family (Ui)i∈I(U_i)_{i \in I} of open subsets of XX with K⊆⋃i∈IUiK \subseteq \bigcup_{i \in I} U_i has a finite subfamily Ui1,…,UinU_{i_1}, \ldots, U_{i_n} with K⊆Ui1∪⋯∪UinK \subseteq U_{i_1} \cup \cdots \cup U_{i_n}.

Remarks

Proof: the open sets of the subspace topology on KK are the sets U∩KU \cap K with UU open in XX. So covers of KK by open sets of KK and covers by open sets of XX match each other. For K=XK = X, the statement is the definition of a compact space. Thus compactness of a subset does not depend on the space around it. If K⊆Y⊆XK \subseteq Y \subseteq X, then KK is compact in YY if and only if it is compact in XX.

Explanations

L1 human

To test if a subset is compact, you can use open sets of the big space. Each time you cover the subset with open sets, finitely many of them must already be enough.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What depends on this

20 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_space, Compactness of subsets