Math 2.0

Relativity and gravitational theory Black holes Theorem

Hawking area theorem

Builds on Event horizonCauchy surfaceEnergy conditionsRaychaudhuri equation

Statement

Let (M,g)(M, g) be a strongly asymptotically predictable spacetime with a black hole, and let HH be its future event horizon. Assume the null energy condition: Ric⁡(k,k)≥0\operatorname{Ric}(k, k) \ge 0 for every null vector kk, where Ric⁡\operatorname{Ric} is the Ricci curvature of gg. Let Σ1\Sigma_1 and Σ2\Sigma_2 be Cauchy surfaces of the globally hyperbolic region, with Σ2\Sigma_2 to the future of Σ1\Sigma_1. Then Area⁡(H∩Σ2)≥Area⁡(H∩Σ1).\operatorname{Area}(H \cap \Sigma_2) \ge \operatorname{Area}(H \cap \Sigma_1).

Remarks

The horizon is generated by null geodesics with no future end points. If their expansion θ\theta were negative somewhere, the Raychaudhuri equation with the null energy condition would force neighbouring generators to focus in finite affine parameter. A small outward deformation of the horizon cross-section would then be a trapped surface visible from infinity, which strong asymptotic predictability rules out. So θ≥0\theta \ge 0 everywhere on HH, and the area grows. Hawking proved the theorem in 1971 assuming enough smoothness of the horizon; later work removed that assumption.

Example: when two Schwarzschild black holes of masses m1m_1 and m2m_2 merge to one of mass mm, the theorem gives m2≥m12+m22m^2 \ge m_1^2 + m_2^2, since the horizon area is 16πm216\pi m^2 in units G=c=1G = c = 1. So at most a fraction 1−m12+m22/(m1+m2)1 - \sqrt{m_1^2 + m_2^2}/(m_1 + m_2) of the total mass can be radiated, about 29%29\% for equal masses.

The null energy condition is necessary. Quantum fields can violate it, and an evaporating black hole emitting Hawking radiation loses area.

Going deeper

For a student

The area theorem is the second of the laws of black hole mechanics. Its analogy with the second law of thermodynamics led Bekenstein to propose that a black hole has an entropy proportional to its area, made precise as the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. Its proof is a typical use of the focusing of null geodesics, the same tool as in the Penrose–Hawking singularity theorems.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 11 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Cauchy surface concept
  2. Congruence of geodesics concept
  3. Einstein field equations concept
  4. Energy conditions concept
  5. Event horizon concept
  6. Geodesic concept
  7. Lorentzian manifold concept
  8. Ricci curvature concept
  9. Penrose–Hawking singularity theorems statement
  10. Raychaudhuri equation statement
  11. Hawking area theorem statement

Where this leads

7 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_thermodynamics
About this page
Tag42EQ4G6978
URIm2://42EQ4G6978
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC83C57, 53C50
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 42EQ4G6978.
AboutEvent horizon, Black hole
UsesEvent horizon, Cauchy surface, Energy conditions, Raychaudhuri equation
Changed3 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by