Math 2.0

Commutative algebra Homological methods Theorem

Hilbert–Burch theorem

Builds on Noetherian ringIdealProjective resolutionDeterminantal idealDepthZero divisor

Statement

Let RR be a commutative Noetherian ring, let II be an ideal of RR, and let n≥1n \ge 1. Suppose that 0→Rn→ARn+1→BR→R/I→00 \to R^n \xrightarrow{A} R^{n+1} \xrightarrow{B} R \to R/I \to 0 is a free resolution of R/IR/I, where AA is an (n+1)×n(n+1) \times n matrix. For i=1,…,n+1i = 1, \ldots, n+1, let Δi\Delta_i be the determinant of the matrix obtained from AA by deleting row ii. Let In(A)=(Δ1,…,Δn+1)I_n(A) = (\Delta_1, \ldots, \Delta_{n+1}) be the ideal of maximal minors. Then:

  1. There is a non-zero divisor a∈Ra \in R such that the entries of BB are aΔ1,…,aΔn+1a \Delta_1, \ldots, a \Delta_{n+1} up to alternating signs; in particular I=aIn(A)I = a I_n(A).
  2. If the depth of II on RR is at least 22, then aa can be taken to be 11, so I=In(A)I = I_n(A).
  3. Conversely, let AA be any (n+1)×n(n+1) \times n matrix over RR such that the depth of In(A)I_n(A) on RR is at least 22. Let BB be the row of the signed maximal minors of AA. Then the complex above is a free resolution of R/In(A)R/I_n(A).

Remarks

The proof compares the resolution with the complex built from the signed minors. That complex is exact by the Buchsbaum–Eisenbud acyclicity criterion when the minors generate an ideal of depth at least 22. Example: for R=K[x,y]R = K[x, y] and A=(−y,x)TA = (-y, x)^T, the maximal minors are xx and −y-y, and 0→R→AR2→(x    y)R→R/(x,y)→00 \to R \xrightarrow{A} R^2 \xrightarrow{(x \;\; y)} R \to R/(x, y) \to 0 is a free resolution. A classical application: the ideal of the twisted cubic curve in K[x0,x1,x2,x3]K[x_0, x_1, x_2, x_3] is generated by the three 2×22 \times 2 minors of a 3×23 \times 2 matrix of linear forms. The theorem describes all perfect ideals of depth 22, that is, all ideals II of depth 22 with pd⁡RR/I=2\operatorname{pd}_R R/I = 2.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem is the first case of the structure theory of finite free resolutions. It explains, for example, why the ideal of an arithmetically Cohen–Macaulay subscheme of codimension 22 in a projective space is generated by the maximal minors of a matrix. The analogous result for Gorenstein ideals of depth 33 is the Buchsbaum–Eisenbud structure theorem with Pfaffians.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 7 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Depth concept
  2. Determinantal ideal concept
  3. Ideal concept
  4. Noetherian ring concept
  5. Projective resolution concept
  6. Zero divisor concept
  7. Hilbert–Burch theorem statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert–Burch_theorem
About this page
TagAG4FF4DNYQ
URIm2://AG4FF4DNYQ
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC13D02, 13C40
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status AG4FF4DNYQ.
AboutProjective resolution, Determinantal ideal
UsesNoetherian ring, Ideal, Projective resolution, Determinantal ideal, Depth, Zero divisor
Same as
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.