Math 2.0

Differential geometry Geodesics Theorem

Hopf–Rinow theorem

Builds on Riemannian manifoldRiemannian distanceExponential mapGeodesicComplete metric spaceCompact spaceBounded setClosed set

Statement

Let (M,g)(M, g) be a connected Riemannian manifold with Riemannian distance dd. The following are equivalent:

  1. the metric space (M,d)(M, d) is complete;
  2. every closed and bounded subset of MM is compact;
  3. there is a point p∈Mp \in M such that the exponential map exp⁡p\exp_p is defined on all of TpMT_pM;
  4. for every point p∈Mp \in M, exp⁡p\exp_p is defined on all of TpMT_pM;
  5. MM is geodesically complete: every geodesic γ\gamma can be extended to a geodesic defined on all of ℝ\R.

If these conditions hold, then any two points p,q∈Mp, q \in M are joined by a geodesic of length d(p,q)d(p, q).

Remarks

The key step is to show that if exp⁡p\exp_p is defined on all of TpMT_pM, then every qq is reached by a minimizing geodesic from pp. Choose a point xx nearest to qq on a small sphere around pp, and follow the geodesic from pp through xx. One shows that it decreases the distance to qq at unit rate until it reaches qq. From this, bounded closed sets are closed subsets of images of compact balls under exp⁡p\exp_p, which gives the other conditions. Example: ℝn\R^n and every compact Riemannian manifold satisfy the conditions. The open disc {x∈ℝ2:∣x∣<1}\set{x \in \R^2 : \abs{x} < 1} with the Euclidean metric fails them: a radial geodesic leaves the disc in finite time, and the sequence (1−1/k,0)(1 - 1/k, 0) is Cauchy with no limit. The last conclusion can hold without completeness, as in the open disc, so it is not equivalent to the conditions.

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem is used constantly in global Riemannian geometry. Completeness is a standing hypothesis in the theorems of Myers, Cartan–Hadamard and others, and one can check it in whichever form is easiest. For example, compact manifolds and homogeneous Riemannian manifolds are complete. It also shows that exp⁡p\exp_p is surjective for complete MM, which is the starting point for the study of the cut locus. The theorem fails for pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, where geodesic completeness and connection by geodesics behave differently.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 9 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Bounded set concept
  2. Closed set concept
  3. Compact space concept
  4. Complete metric space concept
  5. Exponential map concept
  6. Geodesic concept
  7. Riemannian distance concept
  8. Riemannian manifold concept
  9. Hopf–Rinow theorem statement

Where this leads

2 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopf%E2%80%93Rinow_theorem
About this page
TagQCCD2JNFBT
URIm2://QCCD2JNFBT
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC53C22, 53C20
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status QCCD2JNFBT.
AboutRiemannian distance, Geodesic
UsesRiemannian manifold, Riemannian distance, Exponential map, Geodesic, Complete metric space, Compact space, Bounded set, Closed set
Same as
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by