Math 2.0

statement proposition

Linearity of the derivative

Statement

Let VV and WW be normed vector spaces over R\mathbb{R}, let U⊆VU \subseteq V be open, let f,g ⁣:U→Wf, g \colon U \to W, let x∈Ux \in U, and let c∈Rc \in \mathbb{R}. Suppose that ff and gg are Fréchet differentiable at xx, with Fréchet derivatives Df(x)Df(x) and Dg(x)Dg(x). Then f+gf + g and cfc f are Fréchet differentiable at xx, and D(f+g)(x)=Df(x)+Dg(x),D(cf)(x)=c Df(x).D(f + g)(x) = Df(x) + Dg(x), \qquad D(c f)(x) = c \, Df(x).

Remarks

The proof adds the two remainders: a sum of two terms that are o(∥h∥)o(\|h\|) is again o(∥h∥)o(\|h\|). So the maps that are differentiable at xx form a vector space, and f↦Df(x)f \mapsto Df(x) is a linear map on it. The same rules hold for the partial derivatives and for the directional derivatives.

Explanations

L1 human

The derivative of a sum is the sum of the derivatives, and constants come out, just as in one variable. For example, D(x2+3y)D(x^2 + 3 y) at a point (a,b)(a, b) is the linear map h↦2ah1+3h2h \mapsto 2 a h_1 + 3 h_2, the sum of the derivatives of x2x^2 and of 3y3 y.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 3 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Euclidean space object
  2. Fréchet derivative definition
  3. Linearity of the derivative statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fr%C3%A9chet_derivative, Properties